Centralization of Services for Children Born with Orofacial Clefts in the United Kingdom: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract

Objective : To examine current provision of cleft lip and/or palate services in the U.K. and compliance with recommendations made by the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) in 1998. Design : Cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Setting : All 11 services within the U.K. providing care for children born with a cleft lip and palate. Participants : Members from each healthcare specialty in each U.K. cleft team. Interventions : Self-administered postal questionnaires enquired about the provision of cleft services. Data were collected about the overall cleft service, team coordination, hearing, orthodontics, pediatric dentistry, primary cleft surgery, psychology, restorative dentistry, secondary surgery, specialist cleft nursing, and speech and language therapy. Results : Questionnaires were returned from members of 130/150 cleft teams (87%) and these showed that U.K. cleft services have been restructured to 11 centralized services with 17 primary operative sites and 61 peripheral sites. All services provide care through a multidisciplinary (MDT) model, but the composition of each team varies. Primary cleft surgery and orthodontics were the only specialties that were represented in all cleft teams. Specialties may be represented in a team but their attendance at MDT clinics is variable. Only one team met all of the CSAG recommendations. Conclusions : Our survey shows that cleft services have centralized over the last 10 years, and an MDT model of care has been adopted. Further research is needed to show how this has influenced outcomes and to see whether some models of centralized care are associated with better outcomes.

Early complications after esophageal atresia repair: analysis of a German health insurance database covering a population of 8 million

“…It has been postulated that caseload may have an impact on outcome in various operative fields including pediatric surgery . As a result, centralization of the surgical and medical treatment of rare conditions in children such as orofacial clefts, brain tumors, cardiac malformations, and biliary atresia has been recommended by numerous authors. In the United Kingdom, a system of regionalized subspecialization for treating patients with EA/TEF was reported to improve outcomes .…”

Doubts of caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate on postoperative care after cheiloplasty and palatoplasty

“…A study carried out to evaluate institutions providing care for individuals with cleft lip and palate, concerning the adherence to recommendations of a competent institution, concluded that there was a centralization of services in the last decade, yet it was not possible to evaluate the efficacy in relation to better outcomes (21) . However, at national level, there is a tendency of decentralization.…”

Recruiting to cohort studies in specialist healthcare services: Lessons learned from clinical research nurses inUKcleft services

“…In the UK, following a national review in 1998 aimed at improving outcomes (Sandy et al., ), cleft services were centralised and organised into multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) comprising surgeons, clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), speech and language therapists, dentists, orthodontists and, in most cases, clinical psychologists (Scott et al., ). Specialised cleft care is often offered over the lifespan, or at least until early adulthood.…”