2007
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centralization, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance

Abstract: We test the separate and joint effects of centralization and organizational strategy on the performance of 53 UK public service organizations. Centralization is measured as both the hierarchy of authority and the degree of participation in decision-making, while strategy is measured as the extent to which service providers are prospectors, defenders and reactors. We find that centralization has no independent effect on service performance, even when controlling for prior performance, service expenditure and ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
145
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
145
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another major reservation in relation to our study is that formerly applied constructs such as the Miles and Snow constructs from the public management literature (R. Andrews et al, 2008Andrews et al, , 2009aAndrews et al, , 2009b) are difficult to apply in a school setting. This is due to the fact that it is difficult to distinguish between prospectors and defenders in the application of these constructs in the schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another major reservation in relation to our study is that formerly applied constructs such as the Miles and Snow constructs from the public management literature (R. Andrews et al, 2008Andrews et al, , 2009aAndrews et al, , 2009b) are difficult to apply in a school setting. This is due to the fact that it is difficult to distinguish between prospectors and defenders in the application of these constructs in the schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-routine tasks within complex environments are also performed more effectively, as the managers can adapt rapidly due to the low degree of control and formality in the procedures (Andrews et al, 2009). DCS, for example, recently received the 2016 national subscription project, which is of high priority, as it raises a lot of money for the beneficiaries.…”
Section: Organising Hybrid Organisations: Decentralisation Ideologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, there is some evidence that increased managerial decision-making capacity stimulates organizational performance in the public sector, but studies are far from univocal in their findings (for reviews related to agency autonomy, see Laegreid & Verhoest, 2010;Verhoest et al, 2004; for reviews related to decision-making decentralization, see Andrews, Boyne, Law, & Walker, 2007;Boyne & Walker, 2005;Moynihan & Pandey, 2005). Organizational autonomy appears, indeed, to be positively associated with organizational learning (Moynihan & Landuyt, 2009;Schulz, 2001) and the use of performance management techniques (Moynihan & Pandey, 2010), but its counterpart, "centralization," also appears to have positive effects.…”
Section: Organizational Autonomy With or Without External Results Contmentioning
confidence: 99%