2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifuge Modeling of Improved Design for Rocking Foundation Using Short Piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also included in the figure are the MAPE values of multivariate linear regression model (MLR) developed using the same input features and the same training and testing datasets. MLR is a linear, parametric model, where a hyperplane is used to model the relationship between the output and multiple input variables as expressed by Equation (10).…”
Section: Comparison Of Model Performances In Initial Training and Testing Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also included in the figure are the MAPE values of multivariate linear regression model (MLR) developed using the same input features and the same training and testing datasets. MLR is a linear, parametric model, where a hyperplane is used to model the relationship between the output and multiple input variables as expressed by Equation (10).…”
Section: Comparison Of Model Performances In Initial Training and Testing Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shallow foundations, with controlled rocking during earthquake loading, have been shown to have many beneficial effects on the seismic performance of structures by effectively acting as geotechnical seismic isolation mechanisms. More specifically, when the foundation is allowed to rock on its supporting soil, significant amount of seismic energy is dissipated due to plastic shearing and yielding of soil, and this in turn reduces the force and displacement demands transmitted to the superstructure [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Despite the mounting experimental evidences and rationales highlighting the benefits for inclusion of rocking foundations in seismic design [15][16][17][18][19], foundation rocking and soil yielding is still perceived as an unreliable geotechnical seismic isolation mechanism for reducing or eliminating seismic force and ductility demands on structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such undesirable deformations most probably won't jeopardize the structural safety, but can compromise the serviceability of the structure. Therefore, such soil improvement techniques as; shallow soil compaction, 22,28 a combination of shallow soil compaction and geogrid or geocell reinforcements, 23 unattached piles, [36][37][38] soil-cement grid, 39 and placement of concrete pads under the edges of the footing 40 ; have been proposed and investigated by researchers to control residual deformations engendered due to the foundation rocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous ground improvement techniques for the rocking shallow foundation have been investigated, such as the integration of micropiles, 40 stone columns, 41 large rigid foundation slabs, 42,43 and unconnected piles—both short 44 and long 45,46 —to reduce or even eliminate the issues associated with soil settlements and permanent foundation rotations. Despite achieving this goal, the absence of energy dissipation—which would otherwise arise from the inelastic behavior of the bridge pier and the soil medium—results in larger inertial forces to the pier as well as larger deck displacements 47,48,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%