1990
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90027-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centroid sampling: A variant of importance sampling for estimating the volume of sample trees of radiata pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support the empirical evidence of Forslund (1982), whereby the average center of gravity of aspen boles without branches is located at 3/10 of the bole height from its base. Wood et al (1990) also showed the importance of the point on the stem at a relative height of approximately 0.3. They obtained a minimum bias in the estimation of tree volume, using centroid sampling for 114 trees of radiata pine, where the point of sampling was fixed at the height of the centroid.…”
Section: Model Selection For Practicementioning
confidence: 92%
“…These results support the empirical evidence of Forslund (1982), whereby the average center of gravity of aspen boles without branches is located at 3/10 of the bole height from its base. Wood et al (1990) also showed the importance of the point on the stem at a relative height of approximately 0.3. They obtained a minimum bias in the estimation of tree volume, using centroid sampling for 114 trees of radiata pine, where the point of sampling was fixed at the height of the centroid.…”
Section: Model Selection For Practicementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Wood volume was estimated for individual trees by approximating the centroid method (Wood et al 1990, Yavuz 1999) using tree height and two stem diameter measurements. These measurements are expanded to tree-level volume estimates by using equations for sections of a cone.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a semi-distributed model, the SWAT model automatically assigns precipitation data from the rain gauge nearest to the center of a sub-watershed as the areal rainfall input, which is called the centroid method (Wood et al 1990). This traditional method may cause inherent uncertainties because of the following reasons: Rain gauges far from the centroid of a sub-watershed may be abandoned despite their potential value; the effects of climate variation and elevation change are theoretically important, but are not considered in the current version of SWAT model.…”
Section: Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%