2012
DOI: 10.31524/bkkmedj.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic on Ceramic Bearings

Abstract: Figure 1 A-B: (A) Retrieved titanium-alloy femoral porous-coated surface replacement bisected to show the replacement of bone by an invasive granulamalike tissue. This component failed after 50 months in an active 62-year-old man. (B) Histology of the tissue within the femoral head shows sheets of macrophages and giant cells, many with fine, intracellular metallic or UHMWPE debris. Lymphocytes are rarely seen in theses tissues. (Stain, toloidine blue; original magnification, X60.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low hydrophobic property was obtained with increasing Al 2 O 3 concentrations in the PDMS matrix, although there was no significant difference ( p value = 0.4) between surface hydrophobicity with pure PDMS and composites according to the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The low hydrophobic property was obtained with increasing Al 2 O 3 concentrations in the PDMS matrix, although there was no significant difference ( p value = 0.4) between surface hydrophobicity with pure PDMS and composites according to the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Values reported in the literature for pristine ZTA femoral heads of the same diameter are at least 10% [45] higher than the ones shown in Figure 2 for CoCr trunnions. Similar discrepancies in burst testing have usually been associated with stress intensification at the taper interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Second-generation ceramics treated with hot isostatic pressing had smaller grain sizes and fewer impurities [8]. Zirconia was a second-generation ceramics introduced in 1985 because of its improved fracture toughness and bending strength compared with alumina, but it was subsequently found to have inferior wear characteristics [9]. Zirconia was vulnerable to undergoing transformation at high temperatures and wet environments.…”
Section: Evolution Of Ceramic Bearingsmentioning
confidence: 99%