2010
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.235598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral monitoring in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy using a triple assessment technique

Abstract: TCD is less accurate than CO in predicting the need for carotid shunting during CEA. A combination of both methods does not add to the accuracy of detecting the need for carotid shunting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to a previous study published by our group. 10 We found similar results with exclusive EEG monitoring. EEG changes alone had a high specificity of 90.33% but an even lower sensitivity of 28.57% when compared to exclusive SSEP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are similar to a previous study published by our group. 10 We found similar results with exclusive EEG monitoring. EEG changes alone had a high specificity of 90.33% but an even lower sensitivity of 28.57% when compared to exclusive SSEP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…9 Older studies performed to determine the accuracy of these various monitoring techniques have yielded mixed results and lower sensitivities with each method having its own limitations. 10,11 Although the combined utilization of more than one modality has been studied previously, these studies involved small patient populations. 12 Because of this lack of accuracy, acceptance of any one particular or a combination of techniques as the monitoring standard for CEA has not been adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several report rScO 2 during carotid surgery (Williams et al, 1994a,b,c, 1999; Duncan et al, 1995; Kuroda et al, 1996a; Mead et al, 1996; Samra et al, 1996; Duffy et al, 1997; Beese et al, 1998; Carlin et al, 1998; de Letter et al, 1998; Fearn et al, 2000; Takeda et al, 2000; Kawada et al, 2002; Cuadra et al, 2003; Ogasawara et al, 2003; Vets et al, 2004; Komoribayashi et al, 2006; Yamamoto et al, 2007; Ishigaki et al, 2008; Lee et al, 2008; Stoneham et al, 2008; Kobayashi et al, 2009; Giustiniano et al, 2010; Moritz et al, 2010; Ali et al, 2011; Ritter et al, 2011; Pedrini et al, 2012; Uchino et al, 2012). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most reliable monitoring of cerebral ischemia is the continuous assessment of neurocognitive function in the awake patient, given the sensitivity of brain tissue even to very brief periods of ischemia and hypoxia [10,11]. This type of monitoring requires us to carry out the operation under local or regional anaesthesia.…”
Section: Awake Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%