2020
DOI: 10.3390/sym12091509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Sulcal Asymmetry in Macaque Monkeys

Abstract: The asymmetry of the cerebral sulcal morphology is particularly obvious in higher primates. The sulcal asymmetry in macaque monkeys, a genus of the Old World monkeys, in our previous studies and others is summarized, and its evolutionary significance is speculated. Cynomolgus macaques displayed fetal sulcation and gyration symmetrically, and the sulcal asymmetry appeared after adolescence. Population-level rightward asymmetry was revealed in the length of arcuate sulcus (ars) and the surface area of superior t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulcogyral development has been documented in the cerebrum of several mammalian species, including humans [1], baboons [2], cynomolgus monkeys [3][4][5][6][7], common marmosets [8], bovine [9], dogs [10], and ferrets [11][12][13]. The cerebral cortex can be roughly differentiated into four types of surface morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulcogyral development has been documented in the cerebrum of several mammalian species, including humans [1], baboons [2], cynomolgus monkeys [3][4][5][6][7], common marmosets [8], bovine [9], dogs [10], and ferrets [11][12][13]. The cerebral cortex can be roughly differentiated into four types of surface morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, the overall significant rightward asymmetries in the STAP region clearly challenge the claim that these asymmetries are uniquely human, though admittedly, the magnitude of the bias is decidedly smaller in chimpanzees compared to humans. We also note that significant rightward asymmetries have been reported in the overall surface area of the STS in macaques (Bogart et al 2012;Suwada 2020), though it is unclear if these effects are attributable to lateralization within the STAP region because these previous studies did not delineate the STS in the manner that was utilized in this report. Future studies in other species should seek to clarify the nature of STS asymmetry in the context of the location of STAP region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Simultaneously, these sulcal depth differences show lateral asymmetries, with greater differences in depth between left and right sides of the brain in chimpanzees relative to macaques (Bogart et al, 2012;Sawada, 2020 for additional detail on lateralization). This asymmetry in IPS depth is further intensified between humans and chimpanzees and has been specifically connected to language and tool use (Binofski et al, 2016).…”
Section: Neurological Underpinnings Of the Cross-modal Cognitive Suitementioning
confidence: 97%