2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral tissue oximetry levels during prehospital management of cardiac arrest – A prospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For time spent at the scene, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar scene times (P = .570). In the sensitivity analysis, the median (IQR) scene time for those with sensors applied who met the inclusion criteria (n = 53) was 19 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) with no difference between patients with and without NIRS monitoring (P = .867). For total pre-hospital time, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar total pre-hospital time (P = .605).…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, OHCA is associated with increased levels of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the majority of patients who attain ROSC often exhibit poorer neurologic outcomes, compared with those who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest (17). Therefore, it was hypothesized that it might be useful to evaluate the values and dynamics of continuous S ct O 2 measurements during OHCA, particularly around the time of ROSC (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 183 in-hospital CA (IHCA) patients [3] As has been observed for end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ), an abrupt increase in rSO 2 values during CPR indicates that ROSC has occurred [5]. In a study on 53 OHCA patients, 22 (42%) had ROSC after a mean of 22.5 min of CPR; when ROSC occurred, the median rSO 2 increased from 22.5% [16-35] to 51% [39-55] in 3 min [6]. A potential advantage of rSO 2 compared with ETCO 2 for monitoring during CPR is that detection of the rSO 2 signal does not require advanced airway management.…”
Section: Use Of Cerebral Oximetry During Cardiac Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%