Quality Assurance and Certification in Ecotourism 2007
DOI: 10.1079/9781845932374.0266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certification in protected areas: a Western Australian case study.

Abstract: This chapter uses the state of Western Australia as a case study to explore issues relating to the development of various tourism certification programmes in Australia from the perspective of a protected area manager. Possible reasons for the slow uptake of certification programmes in Western Australia and the implications for park agencies are discussed. The chapter also examines some of the developmental, historical and geopolitical issues that have contributed to both the successes and the shortcomings in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 2012 Sustainability Reporting and Certification in Tourism: Buckley interests in improved environmental management, or professional investment in ecocertification programmes, have an incentive for effective differentiation. Government parks agencies may make more functional use of tourism ecocertificatiOl\ but generally establish their OWl\ which they can then rely on (Ingram 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2012 Sustainability Reporting and Certification in Tourism: Buckley interests in improved environmental management, or professional investment in ecocertification programmes, have an incentive for effective differentiation. Government parks agencies may make more functional use of tourism ecocertificatiOl\ but generally establish their OWl\ which they can then rely on (Ingram 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same can be said of tourism companies that are marginalised from the process of setting up criteria or systems for not being the key target market, resulting in inequitable access to certification. There is evidence from Australia to Central America that small firms are more likely to be in this marginalised group (Ingram, 2007;Medina, 2005;Thwaites, 2007;Vivanco, 2007). The remainder of this paper reports the findings of a project that examined the influence of managerial approaches on environmental engagement in small tourism firms when part of a scheme such as GTBS.…”
Section: Small Tourism Businesses and Environmental Management Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that tourism operators seek certification in order to gain preferential treatment from regulatory authorities, such as longer operating licences in national parks (Buckley, 2009). In practice, however, it appears that parks agencies either recognise a range of business certification as well as environmental certification programmes (Ingram, 2007), or establish their own programmes (GBRMPA, 2008). In New Zealand, Rowe and Higham (2007) noted that the only tourism operators which had adopted ecocertification schemes were those which in any event required permits from the national parks agency, the New Zealand Department of Conservation.…”
Section: Undeserved Awards and Certificatesmentioning
confidence: 99%