1999
DOI: 10.1159/000028789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Spine Evaluation in Obtunded or Comatose Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Pilot Study

Abstract: A uniformly accepted protocol for evaluation and clearance of the cervical spine of pediatric trauma patients with altered mental status does not currently exist. We sought to detect cervical spine injuries in this group with minimal risk. Patients were evaluated with standard three-view cervical spine radiographs and CT when necessary. Those patients without radiographic abnormality and altered mental status underwent flexion-extension of the cervical spine using fluoroscopy with somatosensory evoked potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase the sensitivity of detecting injuries in children, they suggested expanding the criteria and imaging the C-spine whenever the NEXUS criteria were present or there was significant mechanism of injury, a history of transient neurologic symptoms or physical evidence of neck trauma, significant trauma to the head or face, or the child was inconsolable (27). Other authors suggest imaging the spine whenever the patient has a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of Ͻ 14 (28). Clearly, there is no consensus on the appropriate criteria for determining when children require C-spine imaging in the ED.…”
Section: Guidelines For Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the sensitivity of detecting injuries in children, they suggested expanding the criteria and imaging the C-spine whenever the NEXUS criteria were present or there was significant mechanism of injury, a history of transient neurologic symptoms or physical evidence of neck trauma, significant trauma to the head or face, or the child was inconsolable (27). Other authors suggest imaging the spine whenever the patient has a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of Ͻ 14 (28). Clearly, there is no consensus on the appropriate criteria for determining when children require C-spine imaging in the ED.…”
Section: Guidelines For Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that instability will be demonstrated under real time imaging, and the test can be terminated before significant cord injury occurs. While this may not be unreasonable, the procedure could potentially be made safer by performing a preceding axial 'stretch test' [116] or monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials [185]. Most studies use criteria for instability similar to those defined by White & Panjabi [186] of 3 mm displacement of adjacent vertebrae or > 11°of angulation, but this is by no means standard.…”
Section: Dynamic Fluoroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRADE recommendation: Conditional Literature Review: a. Scarrow et al 9 performed a pilot study reviewing 17 patients who underwent fluoroscopic FE maneuvers of the cervical spine with somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring. They documented the outcome in 15 patients and found that 7 had hemiparesis.…”
Section: Recommendation 7: Pediatric Patients With An Unreliable Clinmentioning
confidence: 99%