2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD analyses on the water entry process of a freefall lifeboat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Δt is the timestep size, u/Δx is its normal velocity divided by the distance between the cell centre and the centre of the neighbour cell. To avoid numerical convergency, the Co value should be restricted for different applications, such as less than 1 for relative mild flows and less than 0.3 breaking type flows (Huang et al, , 2021c. Therefore, the turbulence modelling strategy selection will dictate y + then link to overall mesh density and timestep choices, thus enormously influencing the computational costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Δt is the timestep size, u/Δx is its normal velocity divided by the distance between the cell centre and the centre of the neighbour cell. To avoid numerical convergency, the Co value should be restricted for different applications, such as less than 1 for relative mild flows and less than 0.3 breaking type flows (Huang et al, , 2021c. Therefore, the turbulence modelling strategy selection will dictate y + then link to overall mesh density and timestep choices, thus enormously influencing the computational costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, both parts of the mesh are not distorted. This method is particularly used for cases with large motions to overcome the limitations of the dynamicMotionSolverFvMesh for those cases, such as a swinging WEC, large structural motions induced by rogue waves, planning hulls, or a water-entry process [45,97,98]. At the present stage, the overInterDyMFoam solver is used for overset simulations.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding mitigations may be seen in [100]. Another potential solution is to build the overset region sufficiently large to avoid communication locations near the area of interest [98], i.e. farther from the structure, which might help in predicting the fluid load/impact.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, both parts of the mesh are not distorted. This method is particularly used for cases with large motions to overcome the limitations of the dynamicMotionSolverFvMesh for those cases, such as a swinging WEC, large structural motions induced by rogue waves, planning hulls, or a water-entry process [45,99,100]. At the present stage, the overInterDyMFoam solver is used for overset simulations.…”
Section: Wave Interaction With Rigid Floating Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding mitigations may be seen in [102]. Another potential solution is to build the overset region sufficiently large to avoid communication locations near the area of interest [100], i.e. farther from the structure, which might help in predicting the fluid load/impact.…”
Section: Wave Interaction With Rigid Floating Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%