2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD-based aeroelastic characterization of streamlined bridge deck cross-sections subject to shape modifications using surrogate models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the cases, the force coefficients are moderate at low angles of attack. The slopes of the lift and moment coefficients provide qualitative information concerning the expected flutter response of a bridge deck, since positive low value slopes are associated to a feasible aeroelastic performance [17]. In this respect, in all the cases, the slopes of the lift and moment coefficients are positive, and they decrease as the gap distance augments, which signals the positive effect caused on the flutter velocity due to the increase in the gap distance.…”
Section: Force Coefficients Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In all the cases, the force coefficients are moderate at low angles of attack. The slopes of the lift and moment coefficients provide qualitative information concerning the expected flutter response of a bridge deck, since positive low value slopes are associated to a feasible aeroelastic performance [17]. In this respect, in all the cases, the slopes of the lift and moment coefficients are positive, and they decrease as the gap distance augments, which signals the positive effect caused on the flutter velocity due to the increase in the gap distance.…”
Section: Force Coefficients Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As previously stated, the only requirement is that the applications involved in the loop can interact via the CLI. In references [3,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], few examples using Dakota to control complex engineering design loops are discussed. However, none of them addressed the use of a fully parametric cloud-based CAD tool to generate the solid geometry or the use of the cloud to deploy the loop.…”
Section: Description Of the Workflow-methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, the only requirement is that the applications involved in the loop are able to interact via the CLI. In references [3,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], few examples using Dakota to control complex engineering design loops are discussed. However, none of them addressed the use of a fully parametric cloud-based CAD tool to generate the solid geometry or the use of the cloud to deploy the loop.…”
Section: Description Of the Workflow -Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%