2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation of a Gifford–McMahon type pulse tube refrigerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed from the above figure that the CFD time scales are much smaller when compared to the experimental time scales. The above observation is in agreement with other CFD studies both on thermoacoustic systems and pulse tube cryocoolers, where similar behaviour is observed [29,37,38]. This may be due to the size of the time steps which are chosen for the CFD analysis.…”
Section: Cfd Analysis Of the Thermoacoustically Driven Standing Wave supporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is observed from the above figure that the CFD time scales are much smaller when compared to the experimental time scales. The above observation is in agreement with other CFD studies both on thermoacoustic systems and pulse tube cryocoolers, where similar behaviour is observed [29,37,38]. This may be due to the size of the time steps which are chosen for the CFD analysis.…”
Section: Cfd Analysis Of the Thermoacoustically Driven Standing Wave supporting
confidence: 92%
“…with 2 the density, the specific heat, the mass flow rate, the heat transfer coefficient, and , , and defined as in Fig. 1.…”
Section: A Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some interesting results can be found in the heat exchanger modelling literature [2], [3], [23], [24], [48], several important practical and theoretical problems remain to be solved as far as heat exchanger identification is concerned. One of them has to do with the selection of a proper model structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then a comparison was made with previous experimental data and the current CFD results. Figure 1 shows the 2-D modeled DIPTR, for which the geometry of Gifford-McMahon-type DIPTR was compared with literature [31]. The dimension of DIPTR was taken in L/D ratio, which was for transfer line 21.098, after cooler 0.846, regenerator 9.772, heat exchanger cold-end 1.470, pulse tube 16.8, heat exchanger hot-end 0.956 and for reservoir 2.772.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%