Renewable Energies Offshore 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18973-42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD study of the overtopping discharge of theWave Dragon wave energy converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flat and round based float shapes were considered, highlighting a significant power output increase for the latter. Eskilsson et al [131] compares viscous (employing RNG − k ε turbulence model) and inviscid simulations for a full scale overtopping type device (Wave Dragon), revealing potentially misleading results when viscosity is omitted.…”
Section: Viscous Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flat and round based float shapes were considered, highlighting a significant power output increase for the latter. Eskilsson et al [131] compares viscous (employing RNG − k ε turbulence model) and inviscid simulations for a full scale overtopping type device (Wave Dragon), revealing potentially misleading results when viscosity is omitted.…”
Section: Viscous Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNWT experiments have also been applied for the assessment of more unconventional WEC devices, for example Eskilsson et al [131] investigate the overtopping discharge of the Wave Dragon and Caskey and Jeans [77] analyse the CycWEC by the means of pressure and force coefficients for its hydrofoils.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of this method are cheaper and faster solution compared to experimental model [18]. It has been progressively used for investigating the hydrodynamic behaviors and structural design performance, mostly in the aspect of wave overtopping discharges [19][20][21][22][23]. The pioneer in this technique, [22] who mostly studied on the reliability of Flow-3D as a design tool by investigating an interaction between wave motion (regular and irregular waves) with several types of coastal struc-tures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANS is a complete and accurate model with respect to nonlinear phenomena but computationally very costly. For example, a simulation with a full sea state for a WEC may require as much as 150 000 CPU hours per simulation [19]. At present RANS models are therefore unsuited for the optimization of single devices, not to mention energy farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%