2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16354-3_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chalk and Cheese in Twitter: Discriminating Personal and Organization Accounts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bots are automated accounts, which have been used for both malevolent activities like spamming and spreading false information, and also for benevolent activities like news and emergency communication (Gilani et al, 2017). Organizational accounts are social media accounts that represent an institution, corporation, agencies, news media, or a common interest group (Oentaryo et al, 2015). However, the Twitter API does not have a built-in function to distinguish these different types of accounts, which is a limitation of the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bots are automated accounts, which have been used for both malevolent activities like spamming and spreading false information, and also for benevolent activities like news and emergency communication (Gilani et al, 2017). Organizational accounts are social media accounts that represent an institution, corporation, agencies, news media, or a common interest group (Oentaryo et al, 2015). However, the Twitter API does not have a built-in function to distinguish these different types of accounts, which is a limitation of the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of approaches exploits textual content such as social posts or profile descriptions of users for feature engineering or learning latent representations via deep learning approaches [5,20,21]. For example, Oentaryo et al used content, social, and temporal features and investigated several machine learning approaches such as random forests and gradient boosting [6], and showed that the gradient boosting classifier provides the best performance [13]. Wood-Doughty et al proposed using a character-based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [9] to learn the representation of a user's name and incorporated profile features such as the ratio of followers to friends together for classifying individual accounts [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As some of the features such as the number of followers or friends can have different scales compared to other features which can make the training of our model difficult, we first scaled those features using a logarithmic transformation, i.e., v 𝑘 ′ = log 10 (v 𝑘 ). Here, v 𝑘 ∈ R 13 denotes the initial values of those features. v 𝑘 ′ is then used as an input to a dense layer to output v 𝑓 ∈ R 128 as shown below using Equation 4.…”
Section: Liic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of this analysis is to infer a latent attribute of such user. Several works have been done on a single and specific perspective such as organization detection [1,3,4,5], bot detection [2,6,7,8,9], political orientation [10], age prediction [11] etc. Twitter user classification approaches involve three major types, mainly statistical-based approaches, content-based approaches and hybrid-based approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%