2021
DOI: 10.1111/hae.14290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in biomarker research in haemophilic arthropathy

Abstract: With great interest, we read the original article 'Detection and evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: Which tools may be considered more reliable' by Plut et al. 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the most promising biomarkers from these pilot series are 1, COL-18 N, COMP, C1,2C, C2M, CS846, serum MIF, plasmatic sVCAM-1 and urinary CTX-II. 25 Here, TNFα levels were significantly increased in arthropathic patients, probably because of chronic synovitis, but it would not be wise to use this non-specific marker of inflammation to intensify prophylaxis since many other circumstances may trigger the expression of this cytokine. Early markers of cartilage damage would be better signatures of articular lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, the most promising biomarkers from these pilot series are 1, COL-18 N, COMP, C1,2C, C2M, CS846, serum MIF, plasmatic sVCAM-1 and urinary CTX-II. 25 Here, TNFα levels were significantly increased in arthropathic patients, probably because of chronic synovitis, but it would not be wise to use this non-specific marker of inflammation to intensify prophylaxis since many other circumstances may trigger the expression of this cytokine. Early markers of cartilage damage would be better signatures of articular lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The heterogeneous design and populations of these studies impair comparing them or even pooling them in a meta‐analysis. Yet, the most promising biomarkers from these pilot series are Coll2‐1, COL‐18 N, COMP, C1,2C, C2M, CS846, serum MIF, plasmatic sVCAM‐1 and urinary CTX‐II 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory assays are not yet integrated into the diagnostic toolkit for HA. There are studies on serum or urine biomarkers of joint damage in haemophiliacs [ 75 ], but the correlation between these biomarkers and joint prognosis is minimal, likely due to the diversity of the populations studied and study designs. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to elucidate the potential role of joint biomarkers in the early-stage diagnosis of HA complications.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Haemophilic Arthropathymentioning
confidence: 99%