“…Some of the apparent advantages are that (i) by virtue of being an osmotically driven process and not a hydraulic pressure process, the propensity for fouling is lower and physically reversible (Shaffer et al, 2015;Phuntsho, 2012;Achilli et al, 2010;Mi and Elimelech, 2010;Lay et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2010;Choi et al, 2009;McGinnies and Elimelech, 2008;McGinnies and Elimilech, 2007); (ii) higher fluxes with recent developments in FO fabrication of thin film composites (TFC), carbon nanotube (CNT) and biomimetic membranes that provide lower concentration polarisation (Shaffer et al, 2015;Tang et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2012a;Zhao et al, 2012b;Zhao et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2010;Yip et al, 2010;Gethard et al, 2011;Schnorr and Swager, 2011); and (iii) where the separation and recovery of the DS after desalination is irrelevant this technology offers a significant advantage over other desalination technologies such as RO (Phuntsho et al, 2012;Phuntsho et al, 2011). However, FO is still limited due to challenges related to water flux; reverse solute flux; lack of suitable FO membranes; fouling for high flux membranes; concentration polarisation; the identification of alternative non-conventional water sources as feed solutions (FS) and limited choices of draw solutes (Akther et al, 2015;Braekevelt et al, 2015;Shaffer et al, 2015;Chung et al, 2012). It is the latter challenge that this paper attempts to address.…”