2014
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Nuclear Medicine: Innovative Theranostic Tools for Personalized Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, one may benefit from this quantitative information to obtain metrics that may enhance (or probably replace) the visual interpretation that is still widely used in everyday clinical practice ( 6 ). In an interesting review, Tomasi and colleagues ( 7 ) advocate the use of quantitative metrics in PET for two main reasons: (i) those metrics are less user-dependent, calculated semi-automatically, and allow multi-center trials if acquisition and reconstruction parameters are carefully chosen ( 8 , 9 ), and (ii) the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals targeting relevant biomarkers ( 10 ) imposes the use of an optimal quantitative approach as conventional quantitative metrics (including visual analysis) may not always be adapted for extracting relevant information. Additionally, beyond the usefulness of quantitative imaging for therapy response or prognosis, those metrics are expected to play a pivotal role for tumor characterization in line with the development of personalized medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, one may benefit from this quantitative information to obtain metrics that may enhance (or probably replace) the visual interpretation that is still widely used in everyday clinical practice ( 6 ). In an interesting review, Tomasi and colleagues ( 7 ) advocate the use of quantitative metrics in PET for two main reasons: (i) those metrics are less user-dependent, calculated semi-automatically, and allow multi-center trials if acquisition and reconstruction parameters are carefully chosen ( 8 , 9 ), and (ii) the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals targeting relevant biomarkers ( 10 ) imposes the use of an optimal quantitative approach as conventional quantitative metrics (including visual analysis) may not always be adapted for extracting relevant information. Additionally, beyond the usefulness of quantitative imaging for therapy response or prognosis, those metrics are expected to play a pivotal role for tumor characterization in line with the development of personalized medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are certain criteria to consider in the development and design of an optimal probe. Sufficient half-life and optimal energy of the radioisotopes have to be complementary to the selected probes for quality imaging [44]. For example, 68 Ga and 18 F for PET are radioisotopes with a short half-life utilized for imaging purposes with drugs that have fast distribution kinetics.…”
Section: Challenges Of Nuclear Imaging and The Role Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So only a few isotopes, for instance, 64 Cu, offer a combination of diagnostic and therapeutic capability. Secondly, phenotype-specific radiopharmaceutical is required for theranostic applications [109]. There are difficulties also related to dosimetry and delivery of the radionuclides to the target tissue.…”
Section: Theranostics Using Radioactive Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%