2012
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20123901001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in the modeling of tidal disruption events lightcurves

Abstract: Abstract. In this contribution, I review the recent developments on the modeling of the lightcurve of tidal disruption events. Our understanding has evolved significantly from the earlier seminal results that imply a simple power-law decay of the bolometric light curve as t −5/3 . We now know that the details of the rise to the peak of the lightcurve is determined mainly by the internal structure of the disrupted star. We also have improved models for the disc thermal emission, showing that in this case the de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reprocessing layer might be a quasi-static configuration of gas [85,71,86,87] or an outflowing wind generated by the disk or the circularization process [88,89]. The second category of solutions argues that the observed optical emission is actually unrelated to accretion power, and is generated in the circularization process itself, as debris streams first dissipate, and then radiate, a fraction of their orbital-energy excess [90,91,72]. The true origin of optical emission in TDEs remains an open question at the time of writing.…”
Section: Accretion-disk Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reprocessing layer might be a quasi-static configuration of gas [85,71,86,87] or an outflowing wind generated by the disk or the circularization process [88,89]. The second category of solutions argues that the observed optical emission is actually unrelated to accretion power, and is generated in the circularization process itself, as debris streams first dissipate, and then radiate, a fraction of their orbital-energy excess [90,91,72]. The true origin of optical emission in TDEs remains an open question at the time of writing.…”
Section: Accretion-disk Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tidal disruption event (TDE) occurs when an unfortunate star passes so close to a supermassive black hole (SMBH) that the tidal force of the SMBH exceeds the self-gravity of the star (Hills 1975). If this takes place outside of the Schwarzschild radius, the result is a luminous flare with L bol ∼ 10 41−45 erg s −1 , powered either by accretion onto the SMBH (Kochanek 1994;Jiang et al 2016b;Lodato 2012;Piran et al 2015). Observationally, these are differentiated from more common transients like supernovae by their higher blackbody temperatures (T ∼ 20, 000 − 50, 000 K) and coincidence with the centres of galaxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest scenario it is possible to estimate the lightcurve of the event through the mass return rate at pericenter: the two quantities will be proportional under the assumption that the circularization and accretion time are considerably shorter than the orbital period of the debris. While the validity of the previous assumptions is currently under debate (the disc might not form efficiently, Svirski et al 2017, and even if the disc forms the single wavelength lightcurve might deviate significantly from the bolometric behaviour, Lodato & Rossi 2011), there is some empirical evidence that the optical luminosity does follow approximately the behaviour predicted analytically, hence giving credit that it might be related directly to the fallback process (Lodato 2012). In this picture, the luminosity of the event will scale as the rate at which the stellar debris fall back onto the black hole, which is easily computed from Kepler's third law, assuming the debris to follow Keplerian orbits after disruption.…”
Section: The Standard Picturementioning
confidence: 99%