Proceedings of the 2007 InSITE Conference 2007
DOI: 10.28945/3099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges IT Instructors Face in the Education Process and Self-Education

Abstract: This paper is about the challenges IT instructors face due to the rapid development of the information technology. IT instructors need to continuously update their own skills and knowledge through self-education. They also need to frequently update course syllabuses and make major changes in the course textbooks if they write them. In order to understand and evaluate these challenges, we conducted a survey among the IT instructors from several colleges and universities, particularly focusing on teaching introd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasingly popular taxonomic and objective-based risk assessment (Trickey, 2011;Airmic / Alarm / IRM, 2010;Borodzicz, 2005;Dorfman, 2007) are relevant, but while such approaches implicate the internal behavioural characteristics of the object under assessment (what we will refer to as the system behaviour), there is limited evidence of this important source of system risk knowledge being mobilized in an explicit way. Where there is evidence of knowledge being deployed it appears to be seen exclusively as an 'emic' property (de Zoysa, 2003;Ruzic-Dimitrijevic, 2014). There is thus a tendency both in academic literature and in practice to interpret the term 'dynamic' [as in 'dynamic risk assessment"] as being to do with the extent to which the risk assessment is performed on a continuing basis, as opposed to a oncefor-all snapshot (Adams, 1995;Nederpelt, 2012).…”
Section: Overall Process Of Risk Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increasingly popular taxonomic and objective-based risk assessment (Trickey, 2011;Airmic / Alarm / IRM, 2010;Borodzicz, 2005;Dorfman, 2007) are relevant, but while such approaches implicate the internal behavioural characteristics of the object under assessment (what we will refer to as the system behaviour), there is limited evidence of this important source of system risk knowledge being mobilized in an explicit way. Where there is evidence of knowledge being deployed it appears to be seen exclusively as an 'emic' property (de Zoysa, 2003;Ruzic-Dimitrijevic, 2014). There is thus a tendency both in academic literature and in practice to interpret the term 'dynamic' [as in 'dynamic risk assessment"] as being to do with the extent to which the risk assessment is performed on a continuing basis, as opposed to a oncefor-all snapshot (Adams, 1995;Nederpelt, 2012).…”
Section: Overall Process Of Risk Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge risk (Ishikawa and Naka, 2003;Massingham, 2010) is an analytical objective in many application domains such as IT (Varajao, et al, 2017), disaster risk management (UNISDR, 2014(UNISDR, , 2105aSpiekermann et al, 2015), fisheries (McDonald et al, 2017), supply chains (Raut et al, 2017), social risk, ecological (Asfaq, 2017;Lou et al, 2017), safety at sea (Goerlandt et al, 2017), safety critical systems (Scott-Parker and Oviedo-Trespalacios, 2017;Bachani et al, 2017) and indeed in the effectiveness assessment of Knowledge Management itself (Boy and Barna, 2005;Benoit, 2011;Ruzic-Dimitrijevic, 2014).…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%