Challenges to adaptation: a fundamental concept for the shared socio-economic pathways and beyond

Abstract

The framework for the new scenarios being developed for climate research calls for the development of a set of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), which are meant to differ in terms of their challenges to mitigation and challenges to adaptation. In order for the scenario process to fulfill its goals, the research and policy communities need to develop a shared understanding of these concepts. This paper focuses on challenges to adaptation. We begin by situating this new concept in the context of the rich literatures related to inter alia adaptation, vulnerability, and resilience. We argue that a proper characterization of challenges to adaptation requires a rich, exploration of the concept, which goes beyond mere description. This has a number of implications for the operationalization of the concept in the basic and extended versions of the SSPs. First, the elements comprising challenges to adaptation must include a wide range of socioeconomic and even some (non-climatic) biophysical factors. Second, careful consideration must be given to differences in these factors across scales, as well as cross-scale interactions. Third, any representation of the concept will require both quantitative and qualitative elements. The scenario framework offers the opportunity for the SSPs and full scenarios to be of greater value than has been the case in past exercises to both Integrated Assessment Modeling (IAM) and Impacts, Climatic Change (2014) 122:495-507

Linking regional stakeholder scenarios and shared socioeconomic pathways: Quantified West African food and climate futures in a global context

“…van Vuuren et al (2014), Rothman et al (2014) and O’Neill et al (2014) suggest that climate related biophysical factors should not be elements of the SSPs, but used in combination with SSPs and climate policies to define an integrated scenario. In the CCAFS scenarios, climate impacts are not “better” or “worse” among the scenarios, rather, climate impacts are examined as a force outside the scenario.…”

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways

“…Climate change risks arise from the combination of climate hazards (or physical impacts of climate change) such as sea level rise, changes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme events; who or what is exposed to those hazards; and their propensity to adverse impacts, whether it is geographic, socioeconomic, cultural, etc. (see Rothman et al 2013, for a discussion of how challenges to adaptation relate to concepts in the impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability literature). Within the scenario matrix architecture, the component of climate change risk due to physical impacts of climate change is reflected in climate model projections based on the RCPs and therefore should not be contained in the SSPs.…”

Applying a capitals framework to measuring coping and adaptive capacity in integrated assessment models

“…Rothman et al (2013) further note that many of the factors comprising the capacities are themselves hard to quantify (citing, for example, institutions, entitlements, kinship networks, health and well-being) and therefore are not discernible at aggregated scales, but stress that "a proper characterization of challenges to adaptation must include such difficult-to-quantify factors".…”