1999
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges to retrospective exposure assessment

Abstract: The following article refers to this text: 2009;35(4):241-319

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After explaining the purpose of the study and obtaining prior informed consent, a self-administered questionnaire (adapted from the Agricultural Health Study 15 ) was applied. Exposure determinants, including characteris-tics that may influence exposure levels 16 , were covered.…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After explaining the purpose of the study and obtaining prior informed consent, a self-administered questionnaire (adapted from the Agricultural Health Study 15 ) was applied. Exposure determinants, including characteris-tics that may influence exposure levels 16 , were covered.…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In every collapsing step, information gets lost. Therefore, it is beneficial to categorize jobs systematically by a set of exposure determinants (Stewart 1999), creating categories as similar as possible with respect to PCBs and other exposures. However, it is important to bear in mind that a job may seem stationary, but due to the changes in the plant the exposure could have changed radically over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layouts over time did not indicate the presence of any exhaust ventilation (the company confirmed this). Based on the available information, we defined the appropriate factors that could affect possible PCB exposures (exposure determinants) (Stewart 1999;Stewart and Stewart 1994) within the plant and in a job. Using exposure determinants to systematize available data for each job has been shown to be efficient (Stewart 1999).…”
Section: Development Of the Jemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed descriptions of industries and tasks are required, and an understanding of historical changes in work practices is necessary. One of the key points highlighted in Stewart's commentary (27) is the need for epidemiologic studies to provide detailed documentation of their assessments to assist others carrying out similar studies and to prevent investigators continually "re-inventing the wheel". For multicenter epidemiologic studies the production of an international "library" of exposure assessment methods and appropriate guidance material would prove useful when retrospective exposure assessments are performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%