2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.100033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges with vitrification of Hanford High-Level Waste (HLW) to borosilicate glass – An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
145
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
145
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In the United States, Al-rich high-level tank waste (HLW) will be vitrified at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), where alumina interacts with chromium, nickel, manganese, iron, and zinc to form spinel in the melter. [2][3][4] This poses challenges to nuclear waste vitrification operations where spinel formation can reduce the efficiency of melters and lead to operational problems. 5,6 Additionally, glasses developed for HLW immobilization are expected to meet specific durability standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 In the United States, Al-rich high-level tank waste (HLW) will be vitrified at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), where alumina interacts with chromium, nickel, manganese, iron, and zinc to form spinel in the melter. [2][3][4] This poses challenges to nuclear waste vitrification operations where spinel formation can reduce the efficiency of melters and lead to operational problems. 5,6 Additionally, glasses developed for HLW immobilization are expected to meet specific durability standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si-[NBO] (Na + ), [3] B-[NBO] (Na + ), [4] B (mostly Ca 2+ ), [4] Al (nearly equally split Na + and Ca 2+ ), and [6] Zr (mostly Ca 2+ ). The network former-BO-network former linkages preferences were also tabulated; Si-O-Al and Al-O-Al were preferred at the expense of lower Si-O- [3] B and [3] B-O- [3] B linkages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this processing constraint has been successfully used to ensure that HLW glasses processed through the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) display comparatively low leaching (ie, high chemical durability), it may also unnecessarily restrict waste loading, contributing to excessive life‐cycle duration and associated costs. While targeted waste loadings at DWPF are around 36 wt% 6 and are generally limited by other constraints (eg, liquidus temperature, viscosity, etc), 7 the HLW at Hanford contains significantly higher concentrations of Al 2 O 3 , 8 which limits the projected waste loading of a large portion of the glass processed through WTP to ~18 wt% if the ND constraint is applied 3,9 . Because of this reality, much research in the last decade has focused on understanding the factors that contribute to nepheline (NaAlSiO 4 ) formation in waste glasses containing relatively high levels of sodium and aluminum, in an attempt to find composition regions that are resilient to nepheline formation without adhering to the current ND 9‐12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the deconvolutions on a few select compositions. As sulfur was added, the intensity of the Q 1 and Q 3 (1075/cm) units remained somewhat invariant after the initial SO 3 loading, whereas Q 2 (1015/cm) units decreased and Q 4 (1150/cm) units increased continuously with increasing SO 3 loading. The ratio of (Q 3 + Q 4 )/(Q 1 + Q 2 ) increased with increasing SO 3 additions, as shown in Table , indicating the overall Si–O network was polymerizing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Safe storage of nuclear waste is an ongoing technical challenge that becomes more important with each passing year, in particular for the cleanup of the Hanford site in southeast Washington State, USA. 1 The processes for creating and extracting plutonium for nuclear weapons were performed at this site for 45 years, and ultimately led to the production of over 200 000 m 3 of radioactive waste now stored in 177 underground tanks. These tanks were not designed for longterm storage, and multiple tanks have started leaking radioactive waste into the ground.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%