2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24899-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Champs algébriques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
882
0
32

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(919 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
882
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of these ideas has expanded to the point where there is now a whole cottage industry on stacks, and they are supposed to be part of our basic tool kit. The standard book reference on this subject is [27] and a concise introduction to the algebraic geometry point of view is in the appendix to [41]. A relative recent introductory paper also exists; see [16].…”
Section: An Extremely Short Introduction To Stacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these ideas has expanded to the point where there is now a whole cottage industry on stacks, and they are supposed to be part of our basic tool kit. The standard book reference on this subject is [27] and a concise introduction to the algebraic geometry point of view is in the appendix to [41]. A relative recent introductory paper also exists; see [16].…”
Section: An Extremely Short Introduction To Stacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.1.5] asserts that we can, in effect, mod out by the automorphisms of the stack of stable vector bundles to obtain a quotient stack without automorphisms, and having the same "moduli space" (i.e., algebraic space representing the sheafification). But since this quotient is already automorphism-free, by [16,Cor. 8.1.1] it is an algebraic space, and hence is itself the sheafification of the stack of stable bundles.…”
Section: Lemma 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Lemma 3.4, Frobenius-unstable vector bundles form a substack of the stack of semi-stable vector bundles, and we see by the same lemma that they must lie within the stable locus. We thus need to check that this is a locally closed sub-stack; since both stacks deal only with quasi-coherent sheaves which are (locally) of finite presentation, and maps between such sheaves, they are clearly locally of finite presentation (i.e., on the level of rings they commute with direct limits; see [16,Prop. 4.15]), so it is easy to see that we may restrict to schemes T of finite type over S, and in particular schemes which are Noetherian.…”
Section: Lemma 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Quasi-separatedness is a running assumption throughout [LMB], along with separatedness of the diagonal.) More specifically, specializing [LMB,5.7.2] to the case of algebraic spaces, one gets: Lemma A.2.10. Let S be a quasi-separated algebraic space.…”
Section: Appendix a Some Foundational Facts For Algebraic Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%