2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-071-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chances and Challenges in Automotive Predictive Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [98], main difficulty here is the lack of sufficiently precise models for design and operation, and of tools for on-line identification. One significant problem is that a model may work accurately at a subsystem level, but when coupled with other models, significant deviations may occur because of several closedloop interactions at an engine level [97].…”
Section: Mils / Silsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [98], main difficulty here is the lack of sufficiently precise models for design and operation, and of tools for on-line identification. One significant problem is that a model may work accurately at a subsystem level, but when coupled with other models, significant deviations may occur because of several closedloop interactions at an engine level [97].…”
Section: Mils / Silsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function and variables in (10) are not the same as in (6). The references are tracked by introducing a quadratic cost on the deviations from (8).…”
Section: B Low-level Control-input Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the single-track model combined with the experimentally verified weighting-functions tire model, which incorporates combined-slip behavior. The low-level controlinput allocator is formulated as a nonlinear model-predictive control (NMPC) problem [6] over a part of the high-level references. Nonlinear optimization problems sometimes fail to converge, or the convergence is slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of this approach is it's relative simplicity, both in that no prior knowledge of the system is required and also that the resulting models are often very fast, [21,33]. The resulting states often have no physical meaning, making analysis difficult [15,62].…”
Section: Modeling Of Diesel-electric Powertrainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting states often have no physical meaning, making analysis difficult [15,62]. Further, the model is only valid around the operating conditions for which it was tuned, leading to questionable extrapolation properties and putting high requirements on training data [21].…”
Section: Modeling Of Diesel-electric Powertrainsmentioning
confidence: 99%