2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-018-1736-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in biochemical parameters of Persian oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) seedlings inoculated by pathogens of charcoal disease under water deficit conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both oak species, the lowest mean values of F v /F m occurred under stress conditions, indicating an impairment of the photosynthetic machinery (F v /F m < 0.6 indicates sustained non‐radiative energy dissipation; Lang et al , Madmony et al ). In line with our data, a similar decrease in the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII in response to drought stress and attack by charcoal agents was previously reported for Persian oak ( Q. brantii ; Ghanbary et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In both oak species, the lowest mean values of F v /F m occurred under stress conditions, indicating an impairment of the photosynthetic machinery (F v /F m < 0.6 indicates sustained non‐radiative energy dissipation; Lang et al , Madmony et al ). In line with our data, a similar decrease in the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII in response to drought stress and attack by charcoal agents was previously reported for Persian oak ( Q. brantii ; Ghanbary et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results showed a marked increase in phenol and flavonoid production in stressed seedlings of Q. infectoria ; however, these secondary metabolites remained nearly constant across treatments in seedlings of Q. libani . The same trend observed for Q. infectoria under pathogen stress was also found for Q. brantii plants infected with charcoal disease and exposed to drought conditions (Ghanbary et al ). Cheynier et al () suggested that high concentrations of these compounds protect plants against pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combined biotic and abiotic stresses may also negatively affect photosynthesis by reducing the concentration of photosynthetic pigments. For example, Ghanbary et al (2018) reported that chlorophyll content decreased due to pathogen infection, drought, and their combination in Q. brantii. These findings indicate that the effect of combined biotic and abiotic stresses on photosynthesis may be worse than each of the individual stresses.…”
Section: Responses Of Forest Trees To Combined Biotic and Abiotic Strmentioning
confidence: 99%