2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in knee kinematics during gait after eccentric isokinetic training for quadriceps in subjects submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinematic analysis used in our previous study 17 identified values that were almost identical to those from the present method. The differences in the results from the two methods (previous method minus present method) were: peak flexion 0.5° (IC95%=0.4°-0.6°), peak extension 0° (-0.5°-0.4°), range of flexion/extension 0.5° (0.1°-1°), peak valgus -0.5° (-0.7°--0.4°), peak varus -0.5° (-0.8°--0.3°) and valgus/varus range 0° (-0.3°-0.3°).…”
Section: Kinematic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The kinematic analysis used in our previous study 17 identified values that were almost identical to those from the present method. The differences in the results from the two methods (previous method minus present method) were: peak flexion 0.5° (IC95%=0.4°-0.6°), peak extension 0° (-0.5°-0.4°), range of flexion/extension 0.5° (0.1°-1°), peak valgus -0.5° (-0.7°--0.4°), peak varus -0.5° (-0.8°--0.3°) and valgus/varus range 0° (-0.3°-0.3°).…”
Section: Kinematic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For this, the 1st and 99 th percentiles, and the 99 th minus the 1 st percentile of the angle distributions, were calculated for 60s of the central part of the gait (the same method as used in our previous study 17 ), for 81% of the recordings (29 out of 36). The reference position was derived in the same way, and for the same time period, for both methods.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the Electrogoniometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations