2009
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in pan evaporation over the past 50 years in the arid region of China

Abstract: Abstract:Pan evaporation, as a surrogate of potential evaporation, is reported to have decreased in different regions of the world since the 1950s. There is much literature to explain the decrease in pan evaporation using the so-called evaporation complimentary relationship hypothesis and it is argued that pan evaporation can be understood as a sign of global warming and indication of an accelerating hydrologic cycle. On the other hand, some scientists insist that the pan evaporation trends may be caused by a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the "pan evaporation paradox" is a manifestation of the CR theory, as major declines of pan evaporation were witnessed in many sites in the US, Canada, Mexico, Iran, Thailand and India [90][91][92][93][94][95][96], many of which are in arid environmental settings. Similar proof for the evaporation paradox was reported in China's northwestern arid regions [33,[97][98][99]. Set against a global background of the evaporation paradox, our research results-i.e., in situ measurements reliably estimated using our proposed model-indicate an increase of actual evaporation and decrease of observed pan evaporation in accordance with the available evidence; furthermore, it adds concrete proof of the existence of the evaporation paradox, as well as to the adaptability of the CR theory in China's hyper-arid region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the "pan evaporation paradox" is a manifestation of the CR theory, as major declines of pan evaporation were witnessed in many sites in the US, Canada, Mexico, Iran, Thailand and India [90][91][92][93][94][95][96], many of which are in arid environmental settings. Similar proof for the evaporation paradox was reported in China's northwestern arid regions [33,[97][98][99]. Set against a global background of the evaporation paradox, our research results-i.e., in situ measurements reliably estimated using our proposed model-indicate an increase of actual evaporation and decrease of observed pan evaporation in accordance with the available evidence; furthermore, it adds concrete proof of the existence of the evaporation paradox, as well as to the adaptability of the CR theory in China's hyper-arid region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The 20 m 2 evaporation tank is found only at some evaporation stations due to high expenses in building and maintaining the equipment, whereas the GGI-3000 is found only in former Soviet Union (FSU) countries, Russia and China [29]. Compared with the evaporation pans previously mentioned, the E601 evaporation pan (i.e., modified GGI-3000 pan) is practical, cost-effective and commonly used by Chinese researchers [10,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. One of the characteristics of the E601 pan is that it has four arc water troughs 20 cm wide, which comprise a water circle to reduce the effects of turbulence generated by the pan (particularly by the rim of the pan) while ensuring accuracy [29,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the decrease in SWS has slowed the expansion of drought areas, resulting in an 8.8% decrease in the drought area in China over the past 40 years (Liu et al 2014a). The SWS decrease has also been identified as a key factor in reducing the atmospheric evaporative demand in China's Yangtze River Basin, Northwest China and North China Plain (Xu et al 2006a;Shen et al 2010;Song et al 2010). Similar decreases in pan-evaporation, mainly attributed to SWS decreases, have also been reported in the United States (Hobbins 2004) and India (Verma et al 2008;Bandyopadhyay et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Basically, the potential factors that influence E pan can be divided into three category terms: thermodynamic term (temperature, sunshine hours and diurnal temperature range), aerodynamic term (wind speed and pressure) and hydrodynamic term (relative humidity, precipitation and low cloud cover) (Liu et al, 2009;Shen et al, 2010). Peterson et al (1995) attributed the general decline in E pan in the United States and the former Soviet Union for the period 1950-1990 to increasing cloudiness.…”
Section: Implications For Pan Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%