2017
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in community perspectives on the roles and rules of church forests in northern Ethiopia: evidence from a panel survey of four Ethiopian Orthodox communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, most of these forest patches are restricted largely on lands managed by followers of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church [32]. A recent inventory by Reynolds et al [33] using high-resolution satellite imagery indicated the presence of more than 8000 church forests in the Amhara Region, ranging from <1 ha to over 100 ha in size.…”
Section: Review On the Status Of Dry Evergreen Afromontane Forests An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most of these forest patches are restricted largely on lands managed by followers of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church [32]. A recent inventory by Reynolds et al [33] using high-resolution satellite imagery indicated the presence of more than 8000 church forests in the Amhara Region, ranging from <1 ha to over 100 ha in size.…”
Section: Review On the Status Of Dry Evergreen Afromontane Forests An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of satellite photographs from 1962 and 2014 indicate that in spite of a thinning of the forest canopy overall, the forested area of the churches in our sample stayed constant, and in some cases actually increased, during five decades of population growth, land tenure instability and extraordinary political turbulence (Scull et al 2017). And yet, like sacred groves and other sacred natural sites globally, the church forests of Ethiopia are threatened by a variety of forces including the conversion of native forest to non-native, economically valuable species (especially eucalyptus), and the construction of buildings inside the forest (Klepeis et al 2016;Reynolds et al 2017;Orlowska and Klepeis, forthcoming.). Outsiders with an environmentalist perspective are often dismayed by these changes and disappointed by the lack of concern on the part of the communities who manage these sites, particularly if they assume their preservation stems from the community's religious-ecological ethos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many of our informants also referenced the beauty of the forest when they said that it gave honor and grace (tsega) to the church. Another meaning of "tsega" is virtue, a meaning mobilized when informants compared the "respectful cover" that the forest gave to the tabot with the clothes that people wear out of modesty (Klepeis et al 2016;Dodds 2015;Reynolds et al 2017).2…”
Section: Npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that forests within each zone experience similar microclimates and environmental conditions, socio-ecological factors likely differ across these Woredas and drive the variations in species composition, which could be informative to future forest conservation efforts. In a study examining community perspectives of church forest use in four church forests across four Woredas in 2002 and 2014 in the South Gondar Administrative Zone, respondents showed a lot of variation in their perceptions of the ecological and social values across Woredas, and there were shifts from social responsibility to official responsibility in protecting the forest and from valuing church laws to valuing state laws [42]. In ethnographic surveys of church forest communities in the South Gondar region, head priests varied in their understanding of why the church forest exists [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%