1961
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in conduction velocity and fibre size proximal to peripheral nerve lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
60
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this stage, the mean axonal conduction velocity of m.g. motoneurones (about 95 % of normal) showed no significant (0.05 < P < 0.10) change; its significant (P < 0-001) decrease (about 91 % of normal) was observed 2 weeks after axotomy (also, see Eccles et al 1959;Kiraly & Krnjevic, 1959;Cragg & Thomas, 1961;Kuno et al 1974;Mendell, Munson & Scott, 1976). The amplitude of monosynaptic e.p.s.p.s is known to be decreased within 2 weeks in motoneurones axotomized by section of the ventral root (Eccles, Libet & Young, 1958;McIntyre, Bradley & 7-2 196 R. GALLEGO AND OTHERS Brock, 1959;Shapovalov & Grantyn, 1968;Kuno & Llings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At this stage, the mean axonal conduction velocity of m.g. motoneurones (about 95 % of normal) showed no significant (0.05 < P < 0.10) change; its significant (P < 0-001) decrease (about 91 % of normal) was observed 2 weeks after axotomy (also, see Eccles et al 1959;Kiraly & Krnjevic, 1959;Cragg & Thomas, 1961;Kuno et al 1974;Mendell, Munson & Scott, 1976). The amplitude of monosynaptic e.p.s.p.s is known to be decreased within 2 weeks in motoneurones axotomized by section of the ventral root (Eccles, Libet & Young, 1958;McIntyre, Bradley & 7-2 196 R. GALLEGO AND OTHERS Brock, 1959;Shapovalov & Grantyn, 1968;Kuno & Llings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is also true of the sural nerve (Quilliam, 1956). Although no comparable anatomical data are available for the peroneal nerve, there is no reason to believe that the situation would be different, and Cragg & Thomas (1961) found that conduction velocity in this nerve is normally closely similar on the two sides. A possible objection to using the unoperated contralateral nerve for control purposes is the observation by Greenman (1913) that following crushing the peroneal nerve on one side in rats, the contralateral nerve showed a diminution in fibre diameter.…”
Section: Histological Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injuries in peripheral nerve fibres result in a reduction of conduction velocity proximal to the lesion (Acheson, Lee & Morison, 1942;Gutmann & Holubar, 1951;Eccles & McIntyre, 1953; Eccles, Krnjevic & Miledi, 1959;Kiraly & Krnjevic, 1959;Cragg & Thomas, 1961;Aitken & Thomas, 1962;Bagust & Lewis, 1974; Kuno, Miyata & Munioz-Martinez, 1974;Mendell, Munson & Scott, 1976;Schmidt & Stefani, 1976). The reduced conduction velocity appears to be associated with a decrease in axon diameter (Greenman, 1913;Gutmann & Sanders, 1943;Gutmann & Holuba6, 1951;Cragg & Thomas, 1961;Aitken & Thomas, 1962).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced conduction velocity appears to be associated with a decrease in axon diameter (Greenman, 1913;Gutmann & Sanders, 1943;Gutmann & Holuba6, 1951;Cragg & Thomas, 1961;Aitken & Thomas, 1962). Mendell et al (1976) have attempted to determine if decreased conduction velocity proceeds centrally from the cut end toward the neurone cell body or in the reverse direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%