2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010jc006249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in distribution of brine waters on the Laptev Sea shelf in 2007

Abstract: [1] Combined salinity and d18 O data from summer 2007 reveal a significant change in brine production in the Laptev Sea relative to summer 1994. The distribution of river water and brine-enriched waters on the Laptev Sea shelf is derived based on mass balance calculations using salinity and d 18O data. While in 1994 maximal influence of brines is seen within bottom waters, in 2007 the influence of brines is highest within the surface layer and only a moderate influence of brines is observed in the bottom layer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
49
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8a). In summer 2007 "onshore" atmospheric conditions prevailed in the Laotev Sea (Bauch et al, 2010). Such an "onshore" scenario forced by the prevailing wind patterns causes Eurasian river runoff from the Laptev Sea to flow preferably eastwards into the East Siberian Sea instead of leaving the shelf northwards (Guay et al, 2001;Dmitrenko et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2008;Bauch et al, 2009Bauch et al, , 2011b.…”
Section: Balancing the Fresh Water Fraction In The Upper Water Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8a). In summer 2007 "onshore" atmospheric conditions prevailed in the Laotev Sea (Bauch et al, 2010). Such an "onshore" scenario forced by the prevailing wind patterns causes Eurasian river runoff from the Laptev Sea to flow preferably eastwards into the East Siberian Sea instead of leaving the shelf northwards (Guay et al, 2001;Dmitrenko et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2008;Bauch et al, 2009Bauch et al, , 2011b.…”
Section: Balancing the Fresh Water Fraction In The Upper Water Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our end-members are following Ekwurzel et al (2001) (table 3). The endmember for meteoric water is set to a δ 18 O of −20 ‰ reflecting average meteoric waters in the Arctic Ocean (Bauch et al, 2010). Calculation of PO 4 * by dissolved O 2 is done assuming that the water is not in exchange with the atmosphere.…”
Section: Balancing the Fresh Water Fraction In The Upper Water Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling procedure and data analysis are described in detail by Bauch et al (2010Bauch et al ( , 2013. The combined interpretation of δ 18 O composition of the water and salinity allows for the quantification of the different freshwater contributions in polar regions, i.e.…”
Section: Riverine Fraction Of Sea Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on measurement precision and range of endmember values, calculated river water fractions are derived within ±1 %. For further details on the method and selection of endmembers refer to Bauch et al (2010).…”
Section: Riverine Fraction Of Sea Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of seasonal ice distribution over the Arctic shelves can also have high biological productivity (e.g., [25,41]. Alterations in the Arctic sea-ice cycle have a considerable hydrographic impact as changes in sea-ice extent and production affect the formation of brines and contribution of sea-ice melt to the water column (e.g., [8]) and all these changes may also impact air-sea exchange. Changes in sea-ice seasonality are also likely to have a dramatic effect on Arctic biological production and communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%