2021
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in forest structure drive temperature preferences of boreal understorey plant communities

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Forests in landscapes with limited forest cover harbour on average more warm-adapted species, which are more suited to the warming climate and are more resilient in the face of disturbances that could rapidly remove the forest buffering capacity (Christiansen et al, 2021;Hylander et al, 2022). In addition, our results (Figure 3)…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forests in landscapes with limited forest cover harbour on average more warm-adapted species, which are more suited to the warming climate and are more resilient in the face of disturbances that could rapidly remove the forest buffering capacity (Christiansen et al, 2021;Hylander et al, 2022). In addition, our results (Figure 3)…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our results however should not be used to undermine the importance of small forest patches in agriculture mosaics (Valdés et al, 2020). Forests in landscapes with limited forest cover harbour on average more warm‐adapted species, which are more suited to the warming climate and are more resilient in the face of disturbances that could rapidly remove the forest buffering capacity (Christiansen et al, 2021; Hylander et al, 2022). In addition, our results (Figure 3) show a linear decrease, without saturation, in CTI with increasing landscape‐scale forest cover; as a result, any amount of forest cover in the landscape can have an effect on CTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced community moisture index and lower community shade tolerance following short‐interval fire suggest differences in community composition expected with warmer, drier soils (Hoecker et al ., 2020) and increased sunlight via a 10‐fold reduction in postfire lodgepole pine densities (Turner et al ., 2019; Braziunas et al ., 2023). These shifts are consistent with expectations of community thermophilization, a process increasingly observed following natural (de Frenne et al ., 2013; Stevens et al ., 2015, 2019; Zellweger et al ., 2020; Christiansen et al ., 2022) and manipulated (de Frenne et al ., 2015; Liu et al ., 2018; Govaert et al ., 2021) changes in temperature and moisture conditions that can persist even after canopy closure (Dietz et al ., 2020). Short‐interval fire also triggered increasing abundance of species capable of growing in lower (and potentially warmer and drier) vegetation zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat conversion is widely regarded as the most important threat to biodiversity worldwide 1 , 2 , and research in European forest ecosystems finds that management-driven changes in the forest canopy can override macro-climatic changes in determining climate-related community shifts 8 , 40 . In contrast, our study provides evidence that climate might currently be the principal driver of plant community turnover at landscape scales in our cool-temperate and boreal study region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%