2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in G1-phase populations in human glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cell lines influence p(66)/Be neutron-induced micronucleus yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these cancer cells are efficiently killed by carbon ions (Iwadate et al, 2001;Tsuchida et al, 1998). Interestingly, it has been recently reported that the amount of micronuclei induced in glioblastoma cell lines by neutron, but not by photon, was dependent on the intrinsic ability of these cells to activate a G1-phase arrest (Akudugu et al, 2004). On the other side, the activation of the G1 checkpoint has been shown to be dependent on the type of specific DNA damage inducer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these cancer cells are efficiently killed by carbon ions (Iwadate et al, 2001;Tsuchida et al, 1998). Interestingly, it has been recently reported that the amount of micronuclei induced in glioblastoma cell lines by neutron, but not by photon, was dependent on the intrinsic ability of these cells to activate a G1-phase arrest (Akudugu et al, 2004). On the other side, the activation of the G1 checkpoint has been shown to be dependent on the type of specific DNA damage inducer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we have investigated the consequences of a treatment combining fast neutrons with cisplatin on the growth and cell death induction in U-87, a human glioblastoma cell line. Indeed, these tumors are resistant to photon but sensitive to fast neutrons (Akudugu et al, 2004). Therefore, they provide ideal model system to explore the cytotoxic response to high-LET radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiation was followed by 24 h concomitant exposure to TMZ (0, 25, 50, 100, or 200 mM) and EPO. Subsequently, medium was replaced with fresh medium for the remaining part of the clonogenic assay (38). For that, 200 cells/well were seeded in six-well plates and incubated at 37 C in 7.5% CO 2 humidified atmosphere.…”
Section: Treatments and Clonogenic Survival Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%