2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0803-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in gas exchange versus leaf solutes as a means to cope with summer drought in Eucalyptus marginata

Abstract: Two of the ways in which plants cope with water deficits are stomatal closure and "osmotic adjustment". We sought to assess the contributions of these processes to maintenance of leaf hydration in field-grown, 7-year-old Eucalyptus marginata. Plants were exposed to their normal summer drought (controls) or supplied with additional water (irrigated). Irrigation increased photosynthesis by 30% in E. marginata. These increases in photosynthesis were related to an 80% increase in g (s). However, there was no diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift in carbohydrate partitioning is likely an adaptive response that helps plants cope with water stress via osmotic and non-osmotic mechanisms. For example, increases in fructose and glucose made a large contribution to osmotic adjustment (Merchant et al 2006b;Warren et al 2007;Foito et al 2009), while the increases in acyclic polyols are consistent with studies showing increases in acyclic polyols under water stress due to their non-osmotic protective functions (Karakas et al 1997;Shen et al 1999;Abebe et al 2003;Li and Li 2005). Increases in some of the key components of cell walls (Keegstra et al 1973), viz., four minor monosaccharides (xylose, arabinose, rhamnose) and two sugar acids (galactonic acid and galactaric acid) suggest that an additional way E. dumosa may have coped with water stress was by increasing synthesis or changing the composition of cell walls, as has been found in other species subjected to water stress (Joly and Zaerr 1987;Zwiazek 1991).…”
Section: Response Of Leaf Metabolites To Water Stresssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The shift in carbohydrate partitioning is likely an adaptive response that helps plants cope with water stress via osmotic and non-osmotic mechanisms. For example, increases in fructose and glucose made a large contribution to osmotic adjustment (Merchant et al 2006b;Warren et al 2007;Foito et al 2009), while the increases in acyclic polyols are consistent with studies showing increases in acyclic polyols under water stress due to their non-osmotic protective functions (Karakas et al 1997;Shen et al 1999;Abebe et al 2003;Li and Li 2005). Increases in some of the key components of cell walls (Keegstra et al 1973), viz., four minor monosaccharides (xylose, arabinose, rhamnose) and two sugar acids (galactonic acid and galactaric acid) suggest that an additional way E. dumosa may have coped with water stress was by increasing synthesis or changing the composition of cell walls, as has been found in other species subjected to water stress (Joly and Zaerr 1987;Zwiazek 1991).…”
Section: Response Of Leaf Metabolites To Water Stresssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…pinitol, ononitol) tend to increase under salt stress and lead to osmotic adjustment (Sanchez et al 2010). In contrast, in many Eucalyptus concentrations of proline are very small, do not necessarily increase under drought and never account for more than a few percent of total osmotic potential (Marsh and Adams 1995;Adams et al 2005;Merchant et al 2006b;Warren et al 2007). Instead, leaves of some (but not all) Eucalyptus contain large constitutive amounts of the cyclohexanepentol proto-quercitol Merchant et al 2006b;Arndt et al 2008), but increases in proto-quercitol due to drought tend to be small and thus its role (if any) in osmotic adjustment is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the initial toughness of northern C. betulus leaves did not differ from that of southern O. carpinifolia leaves. O. carpinifolia leaves might have developed a different resistance strategy for desiccation, which does not entail tougher tissues, such as stomatal control, osmotic adjustment, or cell-wall storage [56]. Thus, our first hypothesis was partially validated, although leaf toughness might depend on the leaf species, despite literature showing that vegetation in a Mediterranean climate (lower mean annual precipitation and higher summer temperatures), such as the southern vegetation examined in this study, generally has more resistant tissues [29], [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%