1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02441413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in marriage seasonality among some european rural populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prioux, who analysed data for the whole Italy from 1960 to 1979, explained the changes in birth seasonality as functions of the relationship between timing of marriage and birth order in periods of declining fertility. This is consistent with other scholars, who have explained birth seasonality evolution over time in terms of social and cultural transformations involving, again, change in the timing of marriage (Lucchetti et al 1996), changes in the social and economic structure (Bobak and Gjonka 2001;Warren and Tyler 1979), and modifications of the labour market (Doblhammer et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Prioux, who analysed data for the whole Italy from 1960 to 1979, explained the changes in birth seasonality as functions of the relationship between timing of marriage and birth order in periods of declining fertility. This is consistent with other scholars, who have explained birth seasonality evolution over time in terms of social and cultural transformations involving, again, change in the timing of marriage (Lucchetti et al 1996), changes in the social and economic structure (Bobak and Gjonka 2001;Warren and Tyler 1979), and modifications of the labour market (Doblhammer et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The change in cultural values and the secularisation of religious beliefs are considered pre-requisites of the Second Demographic Transition (SDT), by making new types of behaviour acceptable in a society (Lesthaeghe and Surkyin 1998;Surkyin and Lesthaeghe 2004). Focusing on marriage seasonality, the proportion of marriages celebrated in March has been interpreted as an indicator of the strength of religious control over the faithful, and then as a possible predictor of the SDT (see, for instance, Lesthaeghe and Lopez-Gay 2013;Luchetti et al 1996;etc.). We proposed, and implemented using Italian data, an alternative indicator for capturing respect for religious prescriptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Luchetti et al (1996) compare marriage seasonality in nine communities in Italy, Spain, and France (three communities per country) between 1800 and 1960, and find that only in one French community was the Lent prohibition not respected, probably because in this community the summer migration of farmhands for working purposes forced them to get married in a preceding period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Lucchetti et al (1996) compare marriage seasonality among nine communities at the crossroads between France, Spain and Italy, from 1800 to 1980: they took three communities in each country. They found that religious norms regarding Lent were respected in all nine communities, but that May credence was found only in the French communities and in one out of three Italian communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%