“…The quality of the evidence is reported in Supplementary Appendix 2 . Study quality ranged from poor ( 21 , 25 , 26 , 32 , 38 , 43 ), moderate ( 12 , 13 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 28 – 31 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 – 41 , 44 ), to good ( 14 , 22 , 27 , 42 ). Strengths across the studies included in-detail descriptions of the RTLS implementation in the residential setting.…”