Changes in Physical Function of Shuttlecock Players after Short-Term Intensive Training based on Data Mining

Abstract

This paper investigates the changes in body composition and physical fitness of badminton players after short-term high-intensity training. Methods. During an 8-week short-term training camp, 12 nonprofessional badminton players were paired to design training sessions, and body composition and fitness were measured before and after training. Results. After 8 weeks of high-intensity training, there was no significant change in body weight of badminton players P > 0.05 , while lean body mass increased significantly and body fat percentage decreased significantly P < 0.05 . The time of kicking, lying on the back, and standing forward was increased P < 0.05 , and the time of running back and forth 6.1 meters 3 times was shorter than that before training P < 0.05 . Conclusion. The increase of lean body mass can promote the energy conversion, oxygen consumption, and exercise capacity of athletes. Short-term training can reduce excess body fat, promote muscle development, and improve physical fitness.

Effects of 15 weeks of Jianzi training on the physical fitness and physiological functions of university female students

“…The game of shuttlecock, often called kicking shuttlecock, is well-known and has a lengthy history. Regular shuttlecock practice may improve a player (Zeng, 2022). The sport of shuttlecock, which originated in China, has a remarkable and significant place in traditional Vietnamese gymnasiums.…”

“…It has been developed for many years in China. The shuttlecock tournament was staged for the first time in December 1928 in Shanghai during the "China Domestic Products Exhibition," which aided in the project's advancement (Zeng, 2022).…”

Retracted: Changes in Physical Function of Shuttlecock Players after Short‐Term Intensive Training based on Data Mining

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”