2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-009-9657-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in plant form and function across altitudinal and wetness gradients in the wetlands of the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa

Abstract: A survey of 93 wetlands in six catchments across the Maloti-Drakensberg is used to assess the distribution of plant functional types across altitudinal and wetness gradients. Altitudes range from 1,000 to 3,200 m a.s.l. Within each catchment, the wetlands were selected to cover the complete range in altitude and wetland types. In each of the selected wetlands, vegetation was sampled in 3 by 3 m quadrats covering the entire range of wetness represented in the wetland, from temporarily wet to permanently inundat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simplification from species to functional groups is also attractive for predictive modeling of vegetation responses to human-induced changes in the environment, e.g., climate change (Nygaard and Ejrnaes 2004). However, despite different classification schemes and terminologies there is no single commonly accepted functional type classification useful for all studies whether they are concerned with wetland or terrestrial plants (Sieben et al 2010). It seems that plant functional groups are being de novo defined for each individual study depending on the study aims (Rejmánková et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplification from species to functional groups is also attractive for predictive modeling of vegetation responses to human-induced changes in the environment, e.g., climate change (Nygaard and Ejrnaes 2004). However, despite different classification schemes and terminologies there is no single commonly accepted functional type classification useful for all studies whether they are concerned with wetland or terrestrial plants (Sieben et al 2010). It seems that plant functional groups are being de novo defined for each individual study depending on the study aims (Rejmánková et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have described the shifting of dominant plant life forms or aboveground plant traits related to C acquisition or nutrient conservation across climatic gradients in a wide range of ecosystems (Cornelissen et al, 1999;Austin & Sala, 2002;Bertiller et al, 2006;Breshears, 2006;Sieben et al, 2010;among others). However, few studies have included variation in plant belowground attributes, such as fine roots, which are especially relevant in relation to C and nutrient stocks and cycling in the upper soil (Jackson, Mooney & Schulze, 1997;Whitford, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sandy) having low values and heavy soils (i.e. clayey) having high values on a scale from 1 to 6 (Sieben, Morris, Kotze, & Muasya, ; categories 7 and 8 were absent in the present study). During the analysis, it became clear that a number of environmental variables were collinear, and those with high variation inflation factor (>20; Ter Braak & Šmilauer, ) were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 44%