2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in quantitative CT image features of ground-glass nodules in differentiating invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma from benign and in situ lesions: histopathological comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the multivariate logistic regression analysis only retained two quantitative radiological characteristics (long diameter and average CT value) as predictors of invasiveness, which was consistent with previous studies [33 , 34] . Average CT value reflects the heterogeneity of GGNs caused by the infiltration of invasive tumor cells [35] . The Fleischner Society has recommended lesion size for management of lung nodules [36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the multivariate logistic regression analysis only retained two quantitative radiological characteristics (long diameter and average CT value) as predictors of invasiveness, which was consistent with previous studies [33 , 34] . Average CT value reflects the heterogeneity of GGNs caused by the infiltration of invasive tumor cells [35] . The Fleischner Society has recommended lesion size for management of lung nodules [36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The most likely explanation is that different cancer cells in different areas of the cancer have different differentiation and growth velocities, and the contractions caused by intratumour fibrosis may contribute to the irregular morphology. 37 Conversely, the literature reports that nodular size is a crucial independent predictive factor for identifying IAs and that increases in GGN size will increase the likelihood of malignancy 38 ; however, lesion size was ruled out in the multiple logistic regression analysis when it was combined with the radiomic features. The reason behind the elimination of lesion size may be that the differences in nodule size between the two histopathologic subtypes were too small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, in most cases, one dedicated pathologist with experience in lung cancer reported the pathologic results, but in some cases, different pathologists with different expertise reported. Fifth, this study did not evaluate longitudinal changes of GGNs, although changes in CT characteristics, including density, are helpful for differential diagnosis [ 30 ]. In addition, in this study, attenuation thresholds of -160 HU and -400 HU were compared, but these are representative values of low and high thresholds, and since neither is likely to be the optimal threshold, further evaluation for determining the optimal threshold will be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%