1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90170-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in retention of various telescope crown assemblies over long-term use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
3
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
64
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The preload of 50 N is recommended because there is no change on the retention force after raising the preload more than 50 N [23]. The retention force values of electroplated double crowns showed no dependence on the preload in range of 5 N to 400 N [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The preload of 50 N is recommended because there is no change on the retention force after raising the preload more than 50 N [23]. The retention force values of electroplated double crowns showed no dependence on the preload in range of 5 N to 400 N [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The influence of the taper angle of double crowns has already been examined [6,13,[19][20][21][22][23]. Ohkawa et al, mentioned a 2° taper angle to be used as a maximum angle for double crown systems in the long-term clinical use [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Retention telescopic crowns are associated with the contact surface of the crown in the system and it depends on many factors, mainly the geometry of the crown and the type of material used to make the crowns [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. The developments of materials and new technologies that can be used in dental prosthetics create the prospects of the appearance of new design concepts and materials in the near future.…”
Section: Open Access Http://scidocorg/ijdosphpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predloženi stupanj za parodontno ugroženi zub jest 6, a primarna teleskopska kapica u strukturi mora sadržavati cervikalni žlijeb. Izmjenama visine i nagiba kapice kontrolira se retencija suprastrukture na kapicama (14,15).…”
Section: Zoidis I Surunclassified