2010
DOI: 10.1177/001979391006300207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Returns to Education in Latin America: The Role of Demand and Supply of Skills

Abstract: Changes in the relative wages of workers with different amounts of education have profound implications for developing countries, where initial levels of inequality are often very high. In this paper we use micro data for five Latin American countries over the 1980s and 1990s to document trends in men's returns to education, and to estimate whether the changes in skill premia we observe can be explained by supply or demand factors. We propose a model of demand for skills with three production inputs, and we al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
101
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
101
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…this elasticity is higher than the 1.4 and 1.6 values reported by Katz and Murphy (1992) and Johnson and Keane (2013) respectively for the United States; it is in line with the 2-2.5 range estimated by Card and Lemieux (2001) also in the United States; and is somewhat lower than the 2.5-5 range reported by Manacorda et al (2010) for the Latin American region. Estimates of the other elasticities of substitution are very similar to those obtained in columns 1-3.…”
Section: Step IIIsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…this elasticity is higher than the 1.4 and 1.6 values reported by Katz and Murphy (1992) and Johnson and Keane (2013) respectively for the United States; it is in line with the 2-2.5 range estimated by Card and Lemieux (2001) also in the United States; and is somewhat lower than the 2.5-5 range reported by Manacorda et al (2010) for the Latin American region. Estimates of the other elasticities of substitution are very similar to those obtained in columns 1-3.…”
Section: Step IIIsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We mostly follow the work of Manacorda et al (2010), with some small modifications to allow for comparability with our baseline results. Production in the economy is also modeled using a nested constant elasticity of substitution (CES) function with three levels.…”
Section: A4 Alternative Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated elasticity of substitution between skilled and unskilled labor is 2.1, very close to the elasticity of substitution between the two unskilled subgroups. Our point estimate for this elasticity is higher than the 1.4 and 1.6 values reported by Katz and Murphy (1992) and Johnson and Keane (2013) respectively for the United States; it is in line with the 2-2.5 range estimated by Card and Lemieux (2001) also in the United States; and is somewhat lower than the 2.5-5 range reported by Manacorda et al (2010) for the Latin American region. Estimates of the other elasticities of substitution are very similar to those obtained in columns 1-3.…”
Section: Step IIIsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…6 See Cragg and Epelbaum (1996); Londoño and Szekely (2000); Sanchez-Paramo and Schady (2003); Behrman et al (2007);Cornia (2010); Manacorda et al (2010) among others.…”
Section: Data and Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por un lado, existen trabajos que evidencian que los cambios en la composición de la oferta relativa de trabajadores cualificados y el bajo ritmo al que se ha incrementado su demanda parecen dominar, debidos probablemente al incremento sustancial del gasto de gobierno dirigido a expandir la educación básica (Montes, 2006;Campos et al, 2012;Esquivel et al, 2012y Lustig et al, 2013. Por otro lado, Gasparini et al (2011) y Manacorda et al (2010 encuentran que los cambios en la composición de la demanda relativa a través del incremento de trabajo cualificado son los dominantes, los cuales fueron sólo parcialmente compensados por un incremento en su oferta relativa. Por tanto, no existe un consenso claro en la evidencia disponible hasta el momento de cuál de estos efectos explica la mayor parte del efecto agregado total sobre los salarios promedio.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified