1998
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0859:cisiwt>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Solar Input, Water Temperature, Periphyton Accumulation, and Allochthonous Input and Storage after Canopy Removal along Two Small Salmon Streams in Southeast Alaska

Abstract: Changes in solar radiation, water temperature, periphyton accumulation, and allochthonous inputs and storage were measured after we removed patches of deciduous, second‐growth riparian vegetation bordering two small streams in southeast Alaska that produce coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Solar radiation and leaf litter input were measured at the water surface at random locations dispersed through six alternating closed‐ and open‐canopy stream sections. Water temperature, periphyton, and stored organic sample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As leaf fall provides the most important source of potential energy for headwater stream ecosystems, alteration of leaf fall biomass, nutrient content or timing may have important ecological impacts. Meanwhile, alterations such as canopy reduction (Smock and McGregor 1988;Hetrick et al 1998;Hutchens and Benfield 2000), increases in canopy shading (Franken et al 2005;Benfield 2006;Minshall and Rugenski 2006) or an alteration of the timing of leaf shading (Benfield 2006;Minshall and Rugenski 2006) disrupt autochthonous pathways that are temporally important sources of energy, even in streams with dense riparian forests (Fausch et al 2002;Kiffney et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As leaf fall provides the most important source of potential energy for headwater stream ecosystems, alteration of leaf fall biomass, nutrient content or timing may have important ecological impacts. Meanwhile, alterations such as canopy reduction (Smock and McGregor 1988;Hetrick et al 1998;Hutchens and Benfield 2000), increases in canopy shading (Franken et al 2005;Benfield 2006;Minshall and Rugenski 2006) or an alteration of the timing of leaf shading (Benfield 2006;Minshall and Rugenski 2006) disrupt autochthonous pathways that are temporally important sources of energy, even in streams with dense riparian forests (Fausch et al 2002;Kiffney et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundaries of this interface are difficult to define, but the riparian zone can be thought of as a patchy area where the environmental variables are not as predictable or homogenous as its adjacent ecosystems (Naiman et al, 1988). This riparian interface regulates stream temperature (Hetrick et al, 1998;Moore et al, 2005), functions as a filter, buffer, and stabilizer (Keller & Swanson, 1979;Naiman & Decamps, 1997) and is the source of in-stream large woody debris (LWD). Forested headwater streams have particularly strong interactions with their riparian zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of riparian vegetation can degrade stream habitats by physical, chemical and structural means. Physical changes such as increased light and water temperature encourage the growth of instream macrophytes and algae (Edwards 1995;Bunn et al 1998;Hetrick et al 1998) and can result in an unpredictable thermal environment for instream species (Murphy et al 1986;Weatherly and Omerod 1990;Hetrick et al 1998). High turbidity, increased pollution, and siltation of riffles are consequences of increased surface runoff and bank erosion (Fennessy and Cronk 1997;Jones et al 1999;Dilworth 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%