2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in sorption of indaziflam and three transformation products in soil with aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is usually attributed to the diffusion of the compound to less accessible adsorption sites (Koskinen et al, 2002). As a result of the ageing process a redistribution of the chemical from weaker to stronger adsorption sites may occur (Gevao et al, 2000) and probably physicochemical interactions of high binding energy were established between tebuconazole (non-polar and hydrophobic compound) and soil components as reported for other compounds (Alonso et al, 2015). The increase of this fraction was higher in S+SMS50 than in S and S+SMS5 and it could explain the lower amount of leached tebuconazole after incubation and the decreased mobility of the fungicide.…”
Section: Leaching Of Tebuconazole In Unamended and Sms-amended Soil Cmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is usually attributed to the diffusion of the compound to less accessible adsorption sites (Koskinen et al, 2002). As a result of the ageing process a redistribution of the chemical from weaker to stronger adsorption sites may occur (Gevao et al, 2000) and probably physicochemical interactions of high binding energy were established between tebuconazole (non-polar and hydrophobic compound) and soil components as reported for other compounds (Alonso et al, 2015). The increase of this fraction was higher in S+SMS50 than in S and S+SMS5 and it could explain the lower amount of leached tebuconazole after incubation and the decreased mobility of the fungicide.…”
Section: Leaching Of Tebuconazole In Unamended and Sms-amended Soil Cmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Alonso et al (2011Alonso et al ( , 2015 have found in sorption and desorption studies that this molecule has the potential of moderate to low mobility in the soil and, once sorbed to the colloids, it hardly returns to the soil solution. Gonzales-Delgado et al (2015), evaluating indaziflam leaching in orchards, found herbicide residues in 7 to 15 cm deep sections and not on the soil surface; the authors' justification for this behavior is based on the low availability of indaziflam for the biodegradation and in the absence of appropriate environmental conditions to promote the process of degradation and sorption of indaziflam to the organic matter or clay at this depth.…”
Section: (A) (B) (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of K oc of the aminocyclopyrachlor ranges between 4 and 67 L kg -1 (Oliveira Júnior et al, 2011, and for indaziflam between 271 and 1,339 L kg -1 (Alonso et al, , 2015. These values indicate that indaziflam has a greater tendency to bind to soil colloids than aminocyclopyrachlor, explaining again the highest potential of mobility in the last columns of the latter herbicide.…”
Section: (A) (B) (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Husnot] as a bioassay indicator, Jhala et al (2012) determined that indaziflam did not leach beyond 30 cm deep in sand soil, when evaluated in column studies. Indaziflam desorption was hysteric for multiple soils examined, indicating decreased potential for mobility (Alonso et al, 2015). Turf weed control with indaziflam was noted for up to 28 weeks (McCullough et al, 2013;Perry et al, 2011) and at least 6 months of weed control noted in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.), pome fruit, stone fruit, and citrus (Allen, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%