2015
DOI: 10.1515/umcschem-2015-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in surface properties of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) treated with air plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface of specimens 1 (0.3-g hydrophobic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) and 2 (0.3-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) that are shown in Figure 5(b) and (c), respectively, presented a homogeneous surface with minimal irregularities, while the specimens 3 (0.27-g hydrophobic and 0.03-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) and 4 (0.03-g hydrophobic and 0.27-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ), corresponding to Figure 5(d) and (e), respectively, exhibit more pronounced irregular regions that can modify the behavior of the water in contact with the surfaces. 19 Contact angle Figure 6 shows the water drop and the contact angle values on the surface of the reference matrix of PMMA and PMMA with hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanoparticles of SiO 2 to different concentrations with a deposition time of 30 s. The specimens showed a hydrophilic behavior (angular contact < 90 ) due to the high polarity of the PMMA matrix 20 and the incorporation of the SiO 2 nanoparticles. 21 The specimen 0 had the greatest contact angle with a magnitude of 79.41 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface of specimens 1 (0.3-g hydrophobic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) and 2 (0.3-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) that are shown in Figure 5(b) and (c), respectively, presented a homogeneous surface with minimal irregularities, while the specimens 3 (0.27-g hydrophobic and 0.03-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ) and 4 (0.03-g hydrophobic and 0.27-g hydrophilic nanoparticles of SiO 2 ), corresponding to Figure 5(d) and (e), respectively, exhibit more pronounced irregular regions that can modify the behavior of the water in contact with the surfaces. 19 Contact angle Figure 6 shows the water drop and the contact angle values on the surface of the reference matrix of PMMA and PMMA with hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanoparticles of SiO 2 to different concentrations with a deposition time of 30 s. The specimens showed a hydrophilic behavior (angular contact < 90 ) due to the high polarity of the PMMA matrix 20 and the incorporation of the SiO 2 nanoparticles. 21 The specimen 0 had the greatest contact angle with a magnitude of 79.41 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the water drop and the contact angle values on the surface of the reference matrix of PMMA and PMMA with hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanoparticles of SiO 2 to different concentrations with a deposition time of 30 s. The specimens showed a hydrophilic behavior (angular contact < 90°) due to the high polarity of the PMMA matrix 20 and the incorporation of the SiO 2 nanoparticles. 21 The specimen 0 had the greatest contact angle with a magnitude of 79.41°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekspozycja badanych polimerów w plazmie generowanej w różnych gazach (powietrze, tlen, argon) prowadzi do obniżenia kątów zwilżania wody (podobnie jak i dijodometanu i formamidu nie prezentowanych w tej pracy [17][18][19] Bez względu na rodzaj stosowanej plazmy inni autorzy po modyfikacji plazmą uzyskali podobny trend zmian zwilżalności PMMA [8,42,[65][66][67][68][69], PEEK [70−72], POM [73], PA6 [74], PC [75,76], PP [77,78]. Kamińska i in.…”
Section: Zmiany Zwilżalności I Adhezji Wody Do Powierzchni Polimerów Po Działaniu Plazmyunclassified
“…Ponadto zaobserwowano również wzrost ilości grup C=O (287,5 eV) oraz COO-i N-C=O (288,9 eV), odpowiednio z 3,1% do 4,6% oraz z 0,9% to 7,6%, co wyraźnie świadczy o procesie utleniania oraz wprowadzania azotu (wzrost ilości azotu do 2,4%) oraz wzroście ilości ugrupowań węgiel-tlen i węgiel-azot, co z kolei wpływa na wzrost polarności powierzchni. To z kolei znajduje odzwierciedlenie w niższych kątach zwilżania oraz wzroście swobodnej energii powierzchniowej PEEK, a w szczególności składowej polarnej [17].…”
Section: Zmiany Zwilżalności I Adhezji Wody Do Powierzchni Polimerów Po Działaniu Plazmyunclassified
“…Similar results regarding the surface oxidation of PMMA have been previously reported. [33][34][35] Contact angle measurements were performed on the PMMA nanobers before and aer UV treatment to study the surface wettability of the PMMA nanobers. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Uv Treatment On Substrate Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%