Soil Erosion and Sediment Redistribution in River Catchments: Measurement, Modelling and Management 2006
DOI: 10.1079/9780851990507.0239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the spatial distribution of erosion within a selectively logged rainforest catchment in Borneo 1988-2003.

Abstract: This paper synthesizes the results of a 15-year study (1988-2003) assessing the changes in slope and catchment erosion and sediment sources within the Segama catchment in Sabah, Malaysia, that was selectively-logged using a combination of tractor and high-lead logging techniques between December 1988 and June 1989 and then left to regenerate naturally. Comparisons are drawn with date on slope erosion rates and sediment sources in adjacent primary forest catchments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would accord with Baru monthly sediment yields in 2003 being of a similar order to those of West Stream (Walsh et al, 2006). On the other hand, the 50% lower nutrient levels in Baru than in West Stream sediment suggests that Baru has not fully recovered from selective logging, but is actively reworking deeper-sourced material from landslide and logging road inputs of the late 1990s (Douglas et al, 1999) that have been stored in debris dams (Walsh et al, 2006). An alternative explanation of the similarity between Baru and West source contributions is that a recent natural landslide less than 200 m upstream of the sampled reach has temporarily elevated deeper subsurface inputs to West stream.…”
Section: The West Baru and Segama Sitessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would accord with Baru monthly sediment yields in 2003 being of a similar order to those of West Stream (Walsh et al, 2006). On the other hand, the 50% lower nutrient levels in Baru than in West Stream sediment suggests that Baru has not fully recovered from selective logging, but is actively reworking deeper-sourced material from landslide and logging road inputs of the late 1990s (Douglas et al, 1999) that have been stored in debris dams (Walsh et al, 2006). An alternative explanation of the similarity between Baru and West source contributions is that a recent natural landslide less than 200 m upstream of the sampled reach has temporarily elevated deeper subsurface inputs to West stream.…”
Section: The West Baru and Segama Sitessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This would accord with Baru monthly sediment yields in 2003 being of a similar order to those of West Stream (Walsh et al, 2006). On the other hand, the 50% lower nutrient levels in Baru than in West Stream sediment suggests that Baru has not fully recovered from selective logging, but is actively reworking deeper-sourced material from landslide and logging road inputs of the late 1990s (Douglas et al, 1999) that have been stored in debris dams (Walsh et al, 2006).…”
Section: The West Baru and Segama Sitesmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…unequal variance), shows that the number of days with some gauges measuring rainfall whilst others recorded none increased as the distance between gauges increased (r 2 D 0Ð6649, P < 0Ð001). The observed spottiness of daily rainfall incidence within an area of only 5 km 2 has significant implications for our ability to extrapolate plot-based estimates of wet-canopy evaporation (Chappell et al, 2001;Bidin and Chappell, 2004), hillslope hydrological experiments (Chappell et al, 1998;Chappell and Sherlock, 2005) or erosion Walsh et al, 2006) across the local region.…”
Section: Rain-day Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5 km 2 study region selected (5°01 0 N and 117°48Ð75 0 E) is 50 km inland from the eastern coast of Sabah, and contains the core study areas of the rainforest research station called the Danum Valley Field Centre (DVFC; Figure 1). The DVFC locality forms the focus of ongoing hydrological research on rainfall, throughfall and wet-canopy evaporation (Chappell et al, 2001;Chappell and Tych, 2002;Bidin andChappell, 2003, 2004), soil-water regulation of landscape ecology (Gibbons and Newbery, 2003), streamflow generation mechanisms (Chappell et al, 1998;Chappell and Sherlock, 2005), rainfall-runoff modelling (Chappell et al, 1998(Chappell et al, , 2004b and erosion Chappell et al, 2004a;Walsh et al, 2006). All of this work could be advanced with a better understanding of the temporal characteristics of rainfall within experimental catchments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%