2020
DOI: 10.15407/ugz2020.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Structure of the Land Cover and Fire Safety of the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone Landscapes: Assessment Methods Using Satellites

Abstract: Метою дослідження є розробка і представлення результатів застосування методів оцінювання та прогнозування рівнів пожежонебезпеки ландшафтів. Дослідження грунтується на аналізі пірологічних характеристик рослинного покриву та даних про сучасний стан і тенденції змін ландшафтів. Дослідження виконано для ландшафтів Чорнобильської зони відчуження. Ця теритрія є пожежонебезпечною, великі площі лісів та перелогів (19 200 га) постраждали тут від пожеж у квітні 2020 р. Методи дослідження: логічне поєднання методів наз… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of wildfires in the highly contaminated area around the CNPP (parts of northern Ukraine, southern Belarus and the western part of the Russian Federation) as well as emission factors or resuspension factors have already been investigated at a local level. Evidence for long-range transport of RN from fires on an international scale is more recent. , Considerable efforts have been made by Ukraine, Belarus, and the Russian Federation to limit the consequences of fires in contaminated areas. , However, despite preventive measures (e.g., controlled fires, fire-breaks, access trails, limitation of fuel quantities in some areas, minimization of human presence) intended to limit both ignition and the spread of wildfires, they occur on a yearly basis in the Chernobyl area , and affect wildlife . The Chernobyl ecosystem has regularly suffered from major wildfires notably in 1992, 1999, 2000, 2002–2004, 2006, 2010, 2015, 2016, and 2018 , with major impacts on the vegetation cover . For a brief historic review of wildfires in contaminated areas, see the Supporting Information (SI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consequences of wildfires in the highly contaminated area around the CNPP (parts of northern Ukraine, southern Belarus and the western part of the Russian Federation) as well as emission factors or resuspension factors have already been investigated at a local level. Evidence for long-range transport of RN from fires on an international scale is more recent. , Considerable efforts have been made by Ukraine, Belarus, and the Russian Federation to limit the consequences of fires in contaminated areas. , However, despite preventive measures (e.g., controlled fires, fire-breaks, access trails, limitation of fuel quantities in some areas, minimization of human presence) intended to limit both ignition and the spread of wildfires, they occur on a yearly basis in the Chernobyl area , and affect wildlife . The Chernobyl ecosystem has regularly suffered from major wildfires notably in 1992, 1999, 2000, 2002–2004, 2006, 2010, 2015, 2016, and 2018 , with major impacts on the vegetation cover . For a brief historic review of wildfires in contaminated areas, see the Supporting Information (SI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The Chernobyl ecosystem has regularly suffered from major wildfires notably in 1992, 1999, 2000, 2002−2004, 2006, 2010, 2015, 2016, and 2018 15,19 with major impacts on the vegetation cover. 20 For a brief historic review of wildfires in contaminated areas, see the Supporting Information (SI). Herein, we investigate the devastating April 2020 wildfires, which lasted for about 4 weeks in the Ukrainian part of the contaminated areas around the CNPP.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%