Handbook of Motivational Counseling 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470713129.ch19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Alcohol Expectancies: Techniquesfor Altering Motivations for Drinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our hypothesis, EC interventions increased negative alcoholrelated expectancies among older, rather than younger, participants. One possible explanation for this finding is that many of these participants had prior experience with the negative effects of alcohol consumption and were ready (and able) to change their alcohol consumption behavior (B. T. Jones, 2004). An alternative explanation is that older college students have had simply more personal experience with negative alcohol-related outcomes (Gadon, Bruce, McConnochie, & Jones, 2004;Leigh & Stacy, 2004); thus, the EC intervention may have inadvertently triggered implicit negative alcohol expectancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to our hypothesis, EC interventions increased negative alcoholrelated expectancies among older, rather than younger, participants. One possible explanation for this finding is that many of these participants had prior experience with the negative effects of alcohol consumption and were ready (and able) to change their alcohol consumption behavior (B. T. Jones, 2004). An alternative explanation is that older college students have had simply more personal experience with negative alcohol-related outcomes (Gadon, Bruce, McConnochie, & Jones, 2004;Leigh & Stacy, 2004); thus, the EC intervention may have inadvertently triggered implicit negative alcohol expectancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention success was measured with two outcomes: (a) alcohol expectancies and (b) alcohol consumption (quantity consumed, frequency of heavy drinking). Although EC interventions targeting negative alcohol expectancies have not been studied among college students, B. T. Jones andcolleagues (2001, 2004) have suggested a need to evaluate the efficacy of EC interventions on both positive and negative expectancies. Challenging positive alcohol expectancies may inadvertently strengthen participants' negative expectancies and possibly increase the number of negative expectancies endorsed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that positive alcohol expectancies predict higher alcohol use, and negative expectancies are associated with lower use (Jones, 2004;Leigh & Stacy, 2004), interventions have been devised to change these expectancies; they come in two forms. The first is based on experiential learning.…”
Section: Individual Interventions (I): Types Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PREVENT, the analysis shows large within-group ES at 3- and 6-month follow-ups whereas The STI Clinic intervention generally reported larger effects in the short-term. One possible explanation for these differences is methodological; that is, many of the participants in PREVENT had prior experiences with the negative effects of alcohol consumption and sexual risk behavior and may have been more receptive to change their behavior [61]. A second explanation for that the larger effect seen at 6-month follow-up in PREVENT is that it reflects the intervention dose (i.e., multiple vs. single-session intervention in The STI Clinic Study), this finding is consistent with previous studies [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%