2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing climate and nutrient transfers: Evidence from high temporal resolution concentration-flow dynamics in headwater catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
112
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A new set of 1.5 km convection-permitting model (CPM) and 12 km parameterised-convection model (PCM) simulations that focus on northern England and Scotland (northern UK; NUK) were completed in 2016 for a study predicting future changes in nutrient transfer in small river catchments (project NUTCAT2050; Ockenden et al 2016). These new simulations are driven by the same general circulation model (GCM) simulations (Mizielinski et al 2014) used in the SUK study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new set of 1.5 km convection-permitting model (CPM) and 12 km parameterised-convection model (PCM) simulations that focus on northern England and Scotland (northern UK; NUK) were completed in 2016 for a study predicting future changes in nutrient transfer in small river catchments (project NUTCAT2050; Ockenden et al 2016). These new simulations are driven by the same general circulation model (GCM) simulations (Mizielinski et al 2014) used in the SUK study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to resource constraints and the complex temporal distribution of naturally transported fine sediment, these approaches are typically biased towards lower flows and concentrations (Carere et al, 2012;Johnes, 2007). These strategies rarely capture the state of the system when erosive processes, and connectivity across the catchment are most active (Ockenden et al, 2016;Perks et al, 2015), failing to reflect the nature of sedimentassociated pollutant transport at appropriately high temporal and spatial scales (Eriksson et al, 2007;Horsburgh et al, 2010). As such, these monitoring campaigns are not robust or rigorous enough to provide realistic estimates of fluxes, or average pollutant concentrations (Etchells et al, 2005;Gray, 1999;Irvine et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous automatic water sampling for estimation of nutrient removal has only been performed in a very restricted number of the wetlands created in agricultural field areas in Sweden. Further, estimations of annual phosphorus removal from water monitoring data in individual wetlands receiving water from agricultural fields are problematic due to that phosphorus transports are highly event-driven and concentration covaries strongly with water flow [14][15][16][17][18]. In this paper, we are approaching these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are approaching these problems. Several studies have shown that in runoff from agricultural fields, phosphorus is transported largely as particulate phosphorus [15][16][17][19][20][21][22]. Therefore, sedimentation is likely to be the predominant phosphorus removal process in wetlands receiving high phosphorus loads [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%