2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing ventilation rates in U.S. offices: Implications for health, work performance, energy, and associated economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A research study on the quantitative benefits of an increased air ventilation rate in offices across the U.S. supports the argument. The study reports the yearly economic benefit of US$13 billion by increasing minimum ventilation rates from 8 to 10 l/s per person and US$38 billion by increasing ventilation rates from 8 to 15 l/s per person on a U.S wide scale (Fisk et al, 2012). These benefits reflect an appreciation of better occupant performance and productivity due to better air quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A research study on the quantitative benefits of an increased air ventilation rate in offices across the U.S. supports the argument. The study reports the yearly economic benefit of US$13 billion by increasing minimum ventilation rates from 8 to 10 l/s per person and US$38 billion by increasing ventilation rates from 8 to 15 l/s per person on a U.S wide scale (Fisk et al, 2012). These benefits reflect an appreciation of better occupant performance and productivity due to better air quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“… Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation (Vernon and Bedford, 1926, Fanger, 1988, Fisk et al, 2012)  Thermal Comfort (Fanger, 1970, De Dear et al, 1997, Tanabe et al, 2007, Djongyang et al, 2010, Lan et al, 2011)  Lighting and Daylighting (Hopkinson et al, 1966, Alrubaih et al, 2013, L Edwards, 2000, Sivaji et al, 2013)  Noise and Acoustics (Sundstrom et al, 1994, Banbury and Berry, 2005, Mui and Wong, 2006)  Office Layout (Brill et al, 1985, Laing et al, 1998, CABE, 2005, Haynes, 2009)  Biophilia and Views (Heerwagen and Orians, 1984, Grinde and Patil, 2009, Heerwagen, 2009, Bright, 2012)  Look and Feel (Mahnke, 1996, Kwallek et al, 1988, Ou et al, 2004 Building Council, 2014)  Location and Amenities (Duffy et al, 1992, Gordon-Larsen et al, 2009, World Green Building Council, 2014 These eight factors have significant interactions and crossover between them. Daylighting has direct interaction with thermal state of an office.…”
Section: Green Buildings and Occupant Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most indoor VOCs originate indoors from sources such as building materials, furnishings, cleaning agents, and consumer products (7)(8)(9). Since worker productivity decreases are correlated with low ventilation rates (10,11), it is plausible that VOCs have impacts of economic as well as medical importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building function, defined as a controlled environment for a given purpose, is of paramount importance for most organisations and is therefore a priority for building managers. In office environments, comfortable working conditions, quantifiable in terms of dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, airflow rates, and other measures, dramatically influence occupant productivity [24][25][26]. Other pivotal variables affect lighting and thermal comfort; these include average window luminance, maximum window luminance, background luminance, and transmitted vertical solar radiation at the window [27].…”
Section: Holistic Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%