Twelfth International Conference on Antennas and Propagation (ICAP 2003) 2003
DOI: 10.1049/cp:20030030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel modelling based on N-state Markov chains for satcom systems simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be able to generate attenuation time series with an N-state Markov model, the states have to represent attenuation levels, so there are many states according to the number of attenuation levels [2], [11]. In the considered time discrete model each state represents an attenuation level with 0.05 dB resolution, so the model is discrete in states as well.…”
Section: The Considered N-state Markov Chain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to generate attenuation time series with an N-state Markov model, the states have to represent attenuation levels, so there are many states according to the number of attenuation levels [2], [11]. In the considered time discrete model each state represents an attenuation level with 0.05 dB resolution, so the model is discrete in states as well.…”
Section: The Considered N-state Markov Chain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the channel to be used more efficiently, since the power and the rate can be allocated to take advantage of favorable conditions. Those methods that counteract the atmospheric propagation losses and permit link adaptation are referred to as FMT (Fade Mitigation Techniques) [1]. The basic idea behind adaptive transmission is to maintain the bit error rate, and therefore the quality of service, during a fade event by adapting transmission parameters to the propagation conditions; parameters which can be adapted are either the transmitted power, the transmission symbol rate, the constellation size, the coding rate/scheme, the space diversity, or any combination of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the uplink is more affected by attenuation than the downlink (because it generally operates at a higher frequency), the downlink attenuation is predicted and then scaled to the uplink frequency in order to estimate the future propagation conditions of the uplink. Various prediction models have been proposed, such as a linear regression (Dossi, 1990), a first order stochastic equation (Manning, 1990(Manning, , 1991, Markov chains (Castanet et al, 2003;Fiebig, 2002), an adaptive linear filter (Grémont et al, 1999), a neural networks (Chambers and Otung, 2005) or a model based on the fade slope ( Van de Kamp, 2002). A comparison was performed with Olympus 20 GHz data (Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%